Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

This Just In! Illinois Dems: Durbin On Obama and On The Flake-out On Withdrawal From Iraq & FDR On Fear and Courage

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo
This Just In! Illinois Dems: Durbin On Obama and On The Flake-out On Withdrawal From Iraq & FDR On Fear and Courage!

Why Durbin is supporting Obama, and why I no longer am! How Durbin sizes up support for withdrawal, in agreement with what this writer has been saying right along. And can the Dems parlay Republican rebellion into votes to pass withdrawal? Is it possible? Finally, what FDR had to say about leadership, fear, and courage.

Durbin says, A Quick End to War is Not Realistic
In an appearance on PostTalk, a interview program Senator Dick Durbin, Majority Whip and a strong supporter of the Presidential candidacy of the Junior Illinois Senator Barack Obama, said he was very happy with Obama’s showing thus far in the campaign.

Durbin was quite impressed with his colleague’s fund raising efforts, boasting more than 250,000 donors, "He's done things that no one's ever expected. To have 250,000 contributors at this moment? No one's even close. It's an indication of grass roots support that any presidential candidate would die for."

Durbin appeared pleased that his Illinois colleague consistently stood with him against the war. He contrasted Obama’s stand with both Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Former Senator John Edwards, who both voted in support of the 2002 use of force resolution, which Durbin voted against. However, Durbin did not allude to the realties that (A) Obama was not in office in 2002 and therefore we cannot know how he would have voted then, especially because (B) He has been sounding increasingly like Senator H. Clinton on the war, these last few months.

In Iowa a few days ago, Obama, said, "I believed then and still do that being a leader means that you'd better do what's right and leave the politics aside, because there are no do-overs on an issue as important as war.” Which words mean absolutely nothing; it is the sort of political nonsense we are used to hearing from Republicans, words that signify nothing.  

Durbin compared Obama to President John F. Kennedy, "I think Barack Obama represents something historic," he added that Obama, like Kennedy, will inspire a new generation of hope.

This writer, however, disagrees. I think the comparison is a bit premature and I see, so far little difference between what Mrs. Clinton is saying and what Mr. Obama is failing to say. For me, so far, I see no Democratic candidate who has a chance to win, for which I would vote. Exciting candidates, I have yet to see in either party.

Senate Durbin discussing other issues indicated that even though some Republicans are expressing unhappiness with the war, none could be counted upon to support his own position on withdrawal. Durbin, commenting on speeches by senior Senate Republicans, which appeared to be at odds with the Bushite Iraq war strategy, haven’t yet appeared in the voting column for Democratic bills setting target dates for withdrawal. Durbin admitted what I have said from the beginning, the Democrats have neither the votes nor the power to push their colleagues to support the demands of those who opposed the war from Day one, nor can Democrats garner enough votes for a cut-off of funds, and, as I have often said, Bush knows he has them over a barrel. Too many of the 2006 Dems and a few leftovers, one as independent, are hawks, and therefore will not support withdrawal.

Impeachment is not “off-The Table,” it is instead, just not possible with the present congress. What is possible is gathering an Ad-Hoc Committee to invoke a Special Prosecutor, but even that has slim hope of passing. As I have said repeatedly, this (2006) election, was not a Democratic Victory, but a show of discontent by some Conservative and moderate Republicans joining Democrats, to try something new, a Democrat who sounded enough like a Republican to satisfy their conscience both ways, so what we got in many cases was a Republi-Crat.

Said Durbin, "Obviously there are folks who want the war to end today, and all the troops to be home tomorrow. And even though I think that is a worthy goal, it is not a realistic goal.”  Now, that, is an understatement!

"We also understand that just leaving cold turkey, with everything gone, could have the whole region descend into chaos." Withdrawing troops, he said, would have to be a gradual thing, done very responsibly. None of which is a surprise to many of us, who knew that the longer we stayed to steal the oil, the less anyone in congress would put up a fuss to leave it to the Iraqi’s and get the hell out.

Senator Durbin, gently poked at Senator Emeritus John Edwards, who has been castigating his former peers Democratic the Senate, for not fighting with more vigor, to end the war. "I recall when John (Edwards) voted for this war. Therefore, it's understandable that he feels badly about that decision and wants to see something done to undo the harm that has happened. But it has to be done in a sensible way."

When Durbin was asked what he thought the current mood of the Republicans on the war amounted to, he alluded to a dramatic speech a few weeks ago by Senator Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) The senior Republican member of the Foreign Relations Committee appeared surprising many at the Senate one night, calling for an immediate change of course.

"I thought, Dick Lugar's position and mine are not different," Durbin said. Quickly other Republican Senators joined Lugar: Senator Pete V. Domenici (N.M.) and George Voinovich (Ohio).

Durbin said, "I can tell they've really lost patience with this administration and its policy in Iraq.”

However, now that the senate has begun Senate two weeks of debate over Iraq and the war, the Republicans have given little further indication of support being manifested by votes. Thus far, Senators Domenici, Voinovich and Lugar, are stalling about setting specific dates for removing troops, joining other Republicans who have voiced enmity about the current war policies and have not followed rhetoric with action.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Professor Bagnolo has majored in: Cultural Anthropology, Architectural design, painting, creative writing. As a child prodigy, abed with polio for almost two years, he was offered an opportunity to skip three grades at age 8.
Later He was a (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ethics In Writing Articles In A Relatively Unsupervised Multi Column News Service Milieu

The Hypocrisy of Monogamy: Divorce and Adultery Versus Polygamy

Was Pat Tillman Killed By Friendly Fire Or Assassinated Because of His Changed Views On The War?

Breaking Story! Marine General Peter W. Pace Resigns as Chairman of Joint Chiefs

Distributive Justice: Barack Obama, Bush and Luke 6: 42


To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend