Breaking News Alert: Liar, Liar Pants Afire-Iran Arms Iraq and Taliban (Uhhuh)
A soap opera of clandestine, covert, treasonous behavior is over looked by Nancy P. while Neo-cons attempt to frame Iran into WW III, and a premonition alert to the President who may being stalked by an old supporter, who thinks Bush stands between him and more oil!
Intrigue, Drama, Lies, Lies and No Video Tape
Defense Secretary Robert Gates and General Dan McNeil, the commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, issued adamantly powerful denials that Iran was supplying arms to the Taliban guerrillas fighting U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan. Those who had interests in creating American attacks against Iran were alleged to have sponsored a media blitz involving Tehran's faux supplying of arms to insurgents there and in Iraq, seem to have had their plans blow up in their faces. I predict neither Gates nor McNeil will be long tenured in their present positions, unless they accept either bribes or manufacture Video evidence lacking to tip America into war with Iran.
That Iran has steadfastly refused to supply arms to the Taliban for more than a decade, seemed not to have fazed certain Administration officials, said to have unleashed a series of press releases the last few weeks. Critics say that this fraud was most likely influenced by sycophants aligned with Vice President Dick Cheney to place Iran in the position of appearing to support al Qaeda and Sunni insurgents, and that those same officials desired to falsely portray Iran as actively pursuing and funding attacks against the US military in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Last week Gates and McNeill both denied that there is any evidence tying Iranian government to those arms. On June 4th Gates in a press conference said, "We do not have any information about whether the government of Iran is supporting this, is behind it, or whether it's smuggling, or exactly what is behind it." Gates thought that "some" of the arms in question might be going to Afghan drug dealers. The denials thwarted further efforts to frame Iran, but some 24% of Americans, either the dumbest, or the most avaricious and bloodthirsty sonsabitches on the planet (or maybe all three), still support all war efforts
It is, of course, obvious that Gates and McNeill are aware that a seeming exchange of arms for heroin between Iran and Afghanistan is taking place. It is no secret that super wealthy Afghan drug dealers have had no trouble negotiating the Afghan/Iran borders. Likewise, US officials have long known that the Afghans have been in buying arms in Iran with drug profits for themselves and apparently the Taliban as well, because the Taliban protects the Afghan drug routes. Bribing border guards is not seen as a difficult job.
In April Pakistani Ambassador to Afghanistan Rustam Shah Momand appeared on Pakistan's GEO television said that the Taliban now controls areas on the Iranian border for the first time. He also said that the Taliban, bloated with heroin profits, made by exports to Iran, buys weapons and munitions in Iran and then smuggles them back into Afghanistan as easily as they smuggle heroin into Iran. However, neither did Momand believe that the Iranian government was involved in the trade in arms.
These efforts to frame Iran as they did Iraq, is a clear message of the contempt in which the Bushites hold the American people-a queer and arrogant hubris in which men lie before hundreds of millions is the most hateful smirk-in-the-face of our citizenry in national history, outreaching in contempt for the American population the lies of even Adolph Hitler. It was only last January and February that State Department, the U.S. Military Command in Baghdad, and the Chief Executive Smirker, Bush himself, said plainly that Iran was sending armour-piercing IEDs to Shiite militias in Iraq, which many saw even then as a bald-faced lie. (Did his pants start afire?)
This BS plus the flurry of anonymous statements by administration officials flatly exceeds the level of despicable behavior expected even from Demoniacs like Adolph Hitler. It is interesting that the
Field commander disagrees strongly with the administration's assertions. Despite the Bush administration's claims last January and February, none, of the Bushite lies were ever supported by material evidence.
Many think it is apparent that Cheney and his alleged Iran Contra type government within a government were trying to get at Iranian oil either by suckering them into war or faking war goods, supply, activities and attacks on American positions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Most interesting is that Gates and McNeill have been refusing to falsify the record and appear unwilling to go public with lies. More, it makes one wonder what it will take the Democrats to drag that cowardly, sadist, Cheney off to jail for treason for attempting again to "create" an Iranian offensive against U.S. forces.
I suspect Gates and McNeill will be the next to go. Either that or, and this verges on the paranoid, that if they are not honest or if Cheney's pals throw vast wealth at them ala, Bushites to Blair, or a seat on the board or investor/employee status in the Carlyle Group, that the Generals, if they see the Neo-con Black-Light of Doom and greed, will have set us all up, in this way: Having rejected faux "evidence" of Iran arms deliveries to Afghanistan and Iraq, they showed integrity, but now if suddenly the field commanders submit to agreement with the well coordinated and deceitful whisper campaign that the Iranian government is supplying Iraqi's, Al-Qaeda, Taliban and the Sunni's with arms, munitions and even ordinance, we are going to see more war because Americans will belibve that even the skeptical Generals are now convinced that Iran is helping the enemy kill Americans. They even might lie and say the information was extracted from an Iranian agent in a "deathbed confession." If that does not happen, if they are above corruption, they will be replaced.
To some, there is no doubt that Cheney is straining, like a long-suffering, marriage partner, to control Bush, by steering him away from the influence of his father and others, which are pleading for him to decide against bombing Iran. That Cheney has been working hard trying to control GW Bush's tendency to regard his "legacy' and reputation, to say nothing of his immortal soul, Cheney is rumored to be covertly spreading the word to Neo-cons and fascist adherents of the "Grab the oil," credo, that there is a strong possibility Bush will go in the wrong direction, that of peace. (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
To most, there is no doubt that Cheney is striving, like a long-suffering, marriage partner, to control Bush, by steering him away from the influence of his father and others, which are pleading for him to decide against bombing Iran. That Cheney has been working hard trying to control GW Bush's tendency to regard his "legacy' and reputation, to say nothing of his immortal soul, Cheney is rumored to be covertly spreading the word to Neo-cons and fascist adherents of the "Grab the oil," credo, that there is a strong possibility Bush will go in the wrong direction, that of peace.
Cheney may, yet, harp once too often on the "Wimp Inheritance" factor and senior Bush may retaliate upon a man who avoided military serve like a pariah, calling a highly decorated WW II naval fighter pilot, a "wimp." GW Bush (Junior) may be, because he avoided going to Viet Nam and Wimped out of every corner into which he painted himself, and his father was a starting first basemen on the Yale baseball team while he was a bench warmer and Cheer leader, extremely sensitive to the issue of Wimpiness. This approach by his Puppeteer, Cheney, could put Cheney, who is not a sitting member of the Carlyle Group and will not be as long as HGW Bush lives, at odds with a man who still has some covert power, Bush Senior.
Has Cheney begun to consider ending the Bush Presidency, so that he could take-over and plunge the world into a massive war, in which perhaps China and Russia would stand together against America? I would not put it past him. I had a dream in which I was eating in a restaurant the other day, couldn't see the group at the next booth, or at the counter, both obscured by booth walls and/or plants, but I, however, indistinctly, heard a fellow say, if he were either HGW Bush and his son, GW, he would be considering a preemptive strike against Cheney, ASAP. He said he would not put it beneath Cheney to do away with the only barriers to his initiating a World War. He said further, he would order the US military to order an air strike and follow-up ground attack against Halliburton and Black Water, as well as Twin Canopies, before Cheney tries to bring them home to create a "terrorist Attack" or other violent "incident" before the election and then attempts Martial Law to eliminate the election and take command as true Dictator. Does such an idea have merit? Many think it does. If the Democrats were such panty-wastes they would have started either impeachment procedures or Appointed a Special Prosecutor to go after the Dictator in Waiting, Cheney, the Coward ala carte'.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).