Incidents of violence have gripped the whole of Pakistan including tribal areas situatated on Pak-Afghan border. Terrorists have been trying to establish a state for themselves where they can carry out terrorist acts in all parts of the world.
According to a comment, As the Swat warlord Fazlullah beheads the
troops captured by his men in the style made current in Pakistan by Al Qaeda - remember Daniel Pearl? - Pakistani politicians mirror the violent act with violent language. And it will not be too long when verbal assault leads to physical assault before and during the electioneering in the next three months. The language has been intemperate since the beginning of the decline of the power of President General Pervez Musharraf, but particularly after March this year when he fired the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
The political theatre began with early hostile exchanges between the ruling PML and the ousted Nawaz League, flecked with venom that only a splinter can have with the rump. After the falling out between President General Pervez Musharraf and the clerical alliance MMA, the hard word spread further and began to dominate the electronic media. The PPP was equally seduced and some of its members ditched the party, but its firebrands were restrained by Ms Bhutto from abroad as she trimmed her sails to the global winds blowing in favour of President Musharraf.
The two parties - PPP and Nawaz League - which had a history of bad-mouthing each other, decided to offer mutual regrets and become friends under the alliance called ARD. The charter they signed for the revival of democracy in Pakistan was flawed at birth and soon died as the leaders back in Pakistan saw themselves losing votes to the breakaway PMLQ simply because the hostility had been switched off. True to the adage all APCs lead to disagreement, Nawaz League formed APDM in London and since then hot words are the only staple of politics in Pakistan. Now the opposition is bad-mouthing itself while equally bad-mouthing the Musharraf establishment. And the pivot of this verbal jousting is nothing less than treason and betrayal of the national cause.
The PPP soon acquired a profile that aroused interest in the West as the only hope left in a violent Pakistan bent upon destroying itself. By voting in favour of a women's rights bill in parliament when the ruling party was hiding behind the clerical skirts, it kindled interest in President Musharraf too. Negotiations, dubbed the "deal of the renegade" by the media where anchors lost their objectivity, were followed by a "national reconciliation ordinance" that no one in Pakistan liked as he was interested in seeing a good battle leading, with luck, to martyrdom. Ms Bhutto arrived, not carrying flowers but a bunch of accusations; she was greeted by her myriad followers and by Al Qaeda with suicide-bombers. What has followed is a virulent verbal exchange.
The world outside sees Pakistan as a most dangerous place to live in and to be visiting. It is mainly focusing on the warlords and crazy mullahs subjecting the country to all kinds of jihad obligations that it can hardly undertake. It is struck with horror by the use of vigilante action under Islam which crushes the spirit of the common man in general and the "common woman" in particular. It must also have noted that Pakistan did not even register the beheading of two women in Bannu recently. It is horrified to also note that Pakistan army surrenders to the ragtag religious fanatics most probably it believes less in the idea of the state of Pakistan and more in the nihilism of the caliphate propagated by Al Qaeda.
Unless the politicians decide to abandon the tongue-lashing they have started administering to one another, violence in the run-up to the general election will come, not from Al Qaeda, but from the people themselves.