Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Confusion in Pakistani Politics Still Persists

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Muhammad Khurshid
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)

Battle for power in Pakistan has been heading towards a great catastrophe as the terrorists have been strengthening their position.

Most of the politicians and journalists in Pakistan have been ignoring one fact  -- that the country is at war with terrorists.

Whatever the motives were behind launching the war on terrorism, its victory now is a must for saving the world from further destruction. Pakistan has a central role as on the one hand, it is the frontline state in the war, but on the other hand, it has also been creating terrorists. So its role is very important.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has made the decision to allow the former prime minister Nawaz Sharif back into the country. Nawaz Sharif is the enemy of President Musharraf, a close ally of President Bush.

The impression here is that al-Qaeda has been promoting Nawaz Sharif as the leader of the Muslims. This is just impression, but there is hard evidence to prove this that al-Qaeda is involved in Pakistani politics.

According to a newspaper comment,  the Supreme Court has decided that Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif are free to return to Pakistan without let or hindrance. The judgement clearly did not give credibility to the “agreement” presented by the government in which the Sharifs undertook to stay away from Pakistan for ten years and not take part in politics.

Mr Sharif says there was no agreement with the government of Pakistan but admits there was an “understanding” with the Saudi Arabian government. However, Mr Sharif refuses to disclose the details of the prosecution of this understanding between his family and Saudi Arabia “because not everything is to be disclosed in the national interest”. The text of the “Harmless Agreement” binds him to secrecy, a condition apparently also accepted by the Musharraf government. Since no other party is mentioned, President Musharraf can be said to be as much bound “under presumption” by its content as Saudi Arabia.

Mr Sharif challenged the government to show evidence after the series of events unfolding in Pakistan since March this year. The government did not apparently anticipate it or it would have acquired the original text of the “Harmless Agreement” from Saudi Arabia much earlier. In any case, this will go down as one of the many oversights of which the government has been guilty in recent times.

The attorney general was stopped by the government from explaining the identity of the “gentleman” mentioned in the agreement who arranged the “agreement” that let the Sharif family leave Pakistan in 2000; but President Musharraf in his book In the Line of Fire has clearly stated that it was arranged by Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud (now King). Was the agreement signed for the “state” of Saudi Arabia? This point is hard to decipher because of the nature of the Saudi state itself.

The news from the Gulf is that the real document containing the “agreement” was lying with the late prime minister of Lebanon, Mr Rafik Hariri, who was said to be a business partner of the Sharif family together with some members of the Saudi family. The report also says that the Saudi government “lost interest” in the prosecution of the “agreement” after the death of King Fahd.

This forces us to presume that the approach of Crown Prince Abdullah to President Musharraf for the release of the Sharif family was made on behalf of the then King. That the signed document was allegedly kept in Lebanon with the Hariri family strongly suggests that the release of the Sharif family was arranged by his friends abroad in their personal capacity. The fact that no other contracting party is mentioned in the agreement and only a “gentleman” is mentioned in the text seems to confirm it as such.

Now the honourable SC has decided that the “Harmless Agreement” is not binding on Mr Nawaz Sharif. So the matter of the pardon granted by the state of Pakistan to Mr Nawaz Sharif in 2000 in pursuance of a “harmless agreement” is bound to become the focus of attention since the government has revived the cases it had set aside after the pardon “because Mr Sharif violated the agreement”.

More significantly, Mr Sharif will have to decide quickly whether he will return to Pakistan immediately or drag his feet on one excuse or the other. The SC judgement has catapulted him into the limelight as the sole challenger to the unpopular General Musharraf. But all this depends on whether or not Mr Sharif is courageous enough to catch the next flight and brave General Musharraf’s repression in Pakistan. If he does, he will surely be arrested.

But given the mood of the Supreme Court he should expect to be bailed out soon enough. That will make him seem even more invincible than he appears in the wake of the SC judgement. Will he take this calculated risk? But if he stays back, he will lose the initiative and Pakistanis will say he is a coward after all and is simply playing politics. Indeed, if he stays back while General Musharraf is able to retain power and hold the next elections, Mr Sharif will be marginalised from politics for a long time. Equally, if he returns to Pakistan but his strategy to become a conquering hero is overtaken by martial law, then he should expect to remain behind bars for as long as General Musharraf is around.

The End

dgement obviously goes against General Musharraf. But it is up to Nawaz Sharif to determine for himself whether it will go in his favour or against him.

Rate It | View Ratings

Muhammad Khurshid Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Muhammad Khurshid, a resident of Bajaur District, tribal areas situated on Pak-Afghan border is journalist by profession. He contributes articles and news stories to various online and print newspapers. His subject matter is terrorism. He is (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Change The System Then There Will No Terrorism

Indo-Pak Tension Affecting War On Terror Badly

Public Execution By Taliban Increases Terror In Tribal Areas

Is Osama Alive Or Really Dead?

Obama Doing Well On The Foreign Front

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend