But I never do see a retraction for their more ridiculous exertions. Maybe Jason Zengerle will surprise us.
It's Wilson who has taken "hits" by the indictments.
"Wilson's full of it when he says Libby and Rove and whomever else blew his wife's cover purely for spite...," and Bush's cronies' motives "don't appear so sinister," Zengerle assures us.
Unbelievable. First of all, Wilson has alleged a range of reasons why the administration blew his wife's cover and spite is merely derivative of one of them -- namely the personal destruction and smearing of a war critic.
There are a couple of obvious reasons for the illegal outing of Plame that Wilson has proposed: Wilson knocked down a central justification for the Iraq war -- No uranium deal in Niger. You know, Jason, the discredited 16 words?
So Libby and scum needed to:
Defend the lie
Intimidate others who would expose the lie
If the folks at the CIA and State department started speaking freely in 2003 like Wilson did, the case for invading Iraq would have begun to look precisely like it does now - a lie that has resulted in the death of 10,000s.
But the Bush administration, surprise, did not defend its lie with facts and logic after Wilson went public. They went after Wilson ad hominem, in effect asserting: Hey, his wife got him the job, she's with CIA, so don't believe his conclusions.
"[A] decision was made to get a 'work-up' on me. That meant getting as much information about me as they could: about my past, about my life, about my family. This, in and of itself, is abominable. Then that information was passed at the appropriate time to the White House Communications Office, and at some point a decision was made to go ahead and start to smear me...," as Wilson told Salon (Salon, May 3, 2004).
What does Zengerle think? Libby and company were just straightening out the record dispassionately, lending a helping hand to reporters out of a commitment to truth because they believed Joe Wilson may have exaggerated how many people in the administration read his report?
The indictments show, so far, that Libby appeared before a federal grand jury and "lied" under oath repeatedly, and "fabricated" a story. Why, Jason, do you think Libby lied and fabricated?