Atlanta Progressive News (January 24, 2006)
The investigative units of several federal agencies are denying their responsibility for probing Bushs approval ofand the US Attorney Generals justifications forwiretapping Americans without the consent of Congress, Atlanta Progressive News (APN) has learned.
The flowchart of non-accountabilitytracing letters to and from members of US Congress, the US Department of Justice, and the US Department of Defensehas been made available on U.S. Representative Zoe Lofgrens website.
Rep. Lofgren and other members of Congress disagree. The investigation should be focused on whether Gonzales did something illegal; it should not take the form of a performance review, they argue, according to a letter on Rep. Lofgrens website.
"It looks like theyre playing hot potato!" one staffer for a member of US Congress told APN.
Meanwhile, the Department of Defense (DOD) declined to investigate the wiretapping issue, arguing that the NSAs own probe would suffice.
The first letter from 39 Members of US Congress was sent on December 20, 2005, to Thomas F. Gimble, Acting Inspector General for the DOD; Glenn A. Fine, Inspector General for the USDOJ; and David M. Walker, Comptroller for the General Accountability Office (GAO).
Mr. Walker of the GAO appears to have not responded as of yet.
"We ask that you begin immediate investigations of these alleged violations of the law and misuse of appropriated funds by the Attorney General of the United States, the Director of the National Security Agency, and any of their subordinate officials. We ask that you be ready to brief us, the undersigned Members of Congress, on the results of your investigations no later than January 31, 2006," wrote Lofgren and the other Members.
No member of the Georgia Congressional Delegation signed their name to the letter.
"Specifically," the letter continues, "the actions of the Attorney General or other Department attorneys in providing legal advice regarding the legality of warrantless surveillance by NSA relates to the legal duties of Department attorneys, which falls within the jurisdiction of the Departments Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), not the OIG.
"As a result, we have contacted the Counsel for the Departments OPR and have forwarded your letter to OPR for its review and any action it deems appropriate," Glenn A. Fine wrote.