Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 6 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Middle East Tightrope: Parental Control Needed

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Message Lynne Glasner
Rob Kall's reference to US role as parent in the Middle East (see for full article) reminds me of the parental admonition "I don't care who started it, both of you just stop it now!" I can hear my mother now and I bet many others have similar memories as we repeat the command to our own children. The Middle East feels like adolescents fighting: "you started, no you started, you hit me first, you pinched me so I hit you back," and on it goes until someone, the adult presumably, intervenes and separates the kids, who go off in different directions and forget about it until the next provocation.

In past US Administrations we had an adult in charge, with other adult members of the team (family) as surrogates at critical moments. Unfortunately, we now have another adolescent at the helm. The oldest sibling, the one who is most competitive and manipulative, never having gotten over the lost attention that the inevitable arrival of siblings brought, is in charge of his younger siblings while the parents are on extended vacation. The eldest is happy to collect the money sent by the absent parents, use it for himself, bully the kids and tell the parents not to worry, everything is fine, no need to rush home. As the parents' time away is extended and the parental rules are pushed to the background, the Lord of the Flies mentality takes over. And that is what we are now seeing in the Middle East. A free for all, alliances spun for short-term gain, manipulation to gain power. It almost doesn't matter who the power is, the result will be the same unless they simply kill the last man standing.

Bush has stood his ground bullying from his bully-pulpit. The response has been predictable: bullies engender fear, but when they form alliances, they can confront the common enemy. The Bush behavior and policies have served to make allies out of former enemies. As the bully loses power, the followers lose interest and other powers come in to take his place. Who and what will fill the vacuum remain to be seen.

There are many issues on both sides; it's complicated and it's certainly not black and white. The question is how to stop the fighting. We need a parent/adult figure to take the reins and be in charge. A delayed call to sister Condi is window dressing and the Bush faux call for Kofi to "just fix it" rings as hollow as the old Nike ad. It's like the adolescent in charge calling on a young babysitter so he can take the night off, hoping that she can fix it while he's out partying.

This conflagration isn't going to end through hope. The fact that no one in the Bush Administration is calling for an immediate cease fire and demanding that the parties meet to discuss what can be done to stop the violence speaks volumes. There are a number of elder statesmen who could be called upon to help, but Bush won't do that; it would make him look weak and it would stop the violence, which helps his brethren in the next election cycle. Cynical as that seems, the realpolitik suggests it's closer to the truth. There is no reason for the US to be disengaged here except that it serves to further the Republican/neocon/AIPAC policy to go after additional Middle East targets with impunity and claim that it's all part of the "long war on global terror."

Most of our other elected officials are too intimidated to take much of a stand. In the mainstream press and in the public mind, it's a black and white issue - Bush & Co. have framed terrorism with "You're either with us or against us." There is no middle in the Middle East. Anyone who questions Israeli tactics is automatically labeled anti-Semitic; anyone who defends Palestinian rights is anti-Israel and wants to see its demise; anyone who perceives the expanded attacks on Lebanon and Syria in terms other than a response to terror is a pacifist. This construct prevents the possibility of change. Western non-US response so far has been weak and measured not to offend, an effort to balance not angering either the Arabs or the Jews. It's a tightrope walk, all right. But there's no safety net in place.

 2006, Lynne Glasner
Rate It | View Ratings

Lynne Glasner Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Lynne Glasner is a freelance writer/editor based in New York City. She has edited numerous books, fiction and nonfiction, many on political subjects. Her essays have appeared in Commondreams,, and Huffington Post as well as OpEd (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Book Review: Conservatives Without Conscience, by John W. Dean

Crime and Punishment: Scholars Weigh In on the Bush Legacy

Book Review: Unacceptable: The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina

The State of the Union Is Frozen

Luck and the Trifecta of Politics

Going Rogue in the Military: The McChrystal Strategy and Original Intent

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend