Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

"Lucky 13" Amendments to Current Election Reform Proposals

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   No comments
Author 2946
Message Kathy Dopp

Election Officials seem to have four main objections to current election reform proposals:

1. Unreasonable Time Frames,

2. Insufficient Funding,

3. The Authority of the US Election Assistance Commission is Strengthened, and

4. Insufficient Flexibility for States.

Election Integrity Activists have similar objections to current election reform proposals:

1. Insufficient, yet Administratively Burdensome, Manual Counts of Voter-Verified Paper Ballots;

2. Loopholes in Manual Audits;

3. The Power of the US Election Assistance Commission is Increased; and

4. Insufficient Public Access to Election Records Necessary for Citizen Oversight Over Elections.

Congress would get greater support from both election integrity groups and election officials alike if Congress makes these "lucky thirteen" amendments to current election reform proposals which would ensure public oversight of elections, adequate manual audits to ensure accurate election outcomes, sufficient funding, reasonable time frames, and flexibility.

http://ElectionArchive.net/docs_other/dopp/AmendHR811.pdf

If you agree with me, please print and fax, or attach to email this "Suggested Amendments to Election Reform Proposals" to House and Senate Members:

http://senate.gov
http://www.house.gov

And especially inform the House Administration Committee and the Senate Rules Committee

http://cha.house.gov/about/default.htm
http://rules.senate.gov/members/

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Kathy Dopp Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Founder and President of US Count Votes, dba The National Election Data Archive and volunteer for honest, accurately counted elections since 2003. Masters degree in mathematics with emphasis on computer science. Has written numerous academic and (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

MSM comes out against computerized voting, finally

Avoid Another HAVA Train Wreck: Software Disclosure Requirements

Who is Supporting and Who is Opposing Current Election Reform Legislation?

It Is Not Whether Or Not To Audit Elections, But HOW!

ES&S Opti-Scans Found Miscounting by 4% (8% margin-swing)

What do the Experts Say About Electronic Voting?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: