Attempts to Kill Freedom of Speech
Ultimately Doomed to Failure
By John E. Carey
Proudly at: http://peace-and-freedom.blogspot.com/
China and Vietnam are among the nations that restrict the internet and email to "approved" topics, words and discussion. People in both countries always assume, and usually correctly, that "Big Brother" is watching.
India, in an effort to stop the communications of subversives following terror bombings in July 2006, also took steps to implement internet and email restrictions.
When India announced even temporary restrictions in internet blogs, the Indian Government took a stand against Freedom of Speech. So the story is really about one of the rights we Americans hold dear, and sometimes take for granted.
Internet sites and computers pose a two edged sword, Communist nations have found. If a government fosters internet communications widely; people will communicate. Before long, if you aren't careful, people will think and communicate at the same time.
The Vietnamese leaders believe that by making their youth more computer savvy, the nation will reap the great benefits of a surging economy for many years to come.
But the Vietnamese leaders, like the Communists in China, want to control the internet, monitor usage by individuals , and limit access to many western sites. Prohibited search words include "democracy," "freedom," and "declaration of independence." Many sites Americans take for granted are prohibited in Vietnam and China: like my own Washington Times (most articles much of the time).
Email is monitored in both China and Vietnam. Users caught writing "subversive" material or communicating too much with western friends find the police at the door.
It seems a pretty good rule of thumb that where information and access to information is limited and controlled by the government: the government is almost always up to something bad. We'll call this the "Peace and Freedom Freedom of Speech Rule of Thumb."
Vietnam and China are perfect examples of our Freedom of Speech Rule of Thumb: no freedom of speech, no freedom of the press, no opposition party or independent government sector, no writs of habeas corpus, no search warrants authorized by an independent judiciary, no "Miranda rights," and no probable cause. Add a tireless attempt to limit and control what the people can know and you have yourself a witch's brew rife with human rights violations.
It is a very sad commentary that India feels that it is appropriate and useful to limit "blogs," no matter what their content.
It is an even sadder commentary that U.S. companies including Google and Microsoft, eager to get into the huge Asian market including more than 123 Million Chinese users, acquiesced to the Chinese restrictions on internet and email use that the Chinese demanded.
I know these corporations have an obligation to their shareholders. I know the Chinese market is too big to totally cede to others. I know the arguments. But I don't buy them.