Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Essence of Faggotry

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   4 comments
Author 6322
Message Jim Arnold
Become a Fan
  (27 fans)

I was a hetero adolescent. I’m still a hetero, and in some ways, I’m afraid, I’m still a bit of an adolescent. But this isn’t about me. It’s about faggotry.

My own relationship with that most powerful, evocative word goes back to my early teens, when my buddies and I first experienced a visceral reaction to all its deviations - fag, f*ggot, and faggotry - and the awful behavior (to us) they insinuated. I was swept to the gut with revulsion at the idea that someone male would have a leering lust for my penis. The idea seemed utterly devoid of dignity and taste. Depraved, despicable.

It didn’t occur to me that my own pubescent lust for girls and their private parts was no less obsessive, no less wanton than the gay orientation. That insight came to me when I was few years older, when as a low-grade Marine, hitchhiking up and down the East Coast on weekends and often sleeping in bus stations, I frequently experienced the other side of unwanted advances from men. As if seeing myself in reflection, I realized I was, in essence, just a f*g for girls. Thereafter, fortunately I think, I developed an impediment in my own hetero version of sex-faggotry.

But I digress.

The etymology of faggotry, the conceptual seed, or sperm (if I may), as it was first inserted in our verbal intercourse, is something more base, existential, and not necessarily sexual. Some words just sound like they were made to express a thing or attribute. The word stink just sounds like a bad smell. The word f*g has come down to us from the distant past, and I think we feel it deep-down somehow. Unless we're English, it seems to epitomize human self-degradation in general, perversion forsaking virtue, for which sexual depravity is only an instance, and homosexuality only a diversionary target.

Homosexuals are, I think, no more, no less ignoble than heteros. Actually, in my own experience, they seem on the whole somewhat more dignified and sensitive than heteros. No, faggotry describes something more primal, a more fundamental flaw of character than any particular sexual preoccupation.

I’m struck most of all by the prevalence of actual faggotry in politics, and in the world of intrigue among political hangers-on. If anyone is a f*g, it would have to be Ann Coulter. Consider her depraved obsession with wealth and notoriety at the expense of everything dignified, true, and good: It’s faggotry, in the best sense of the word.

I’m not into name-calling. We might say someone is a philanthropist, not to call her a name (however nice), not just because she spends a lot of time and money on charitable or desperate causes, but because it’s her essential orientation in life. It defines her guiding light as a person. In just the same way, Rush Limbaugh is a f*g – not because he may have a special thing for young Dominican boys, but because of his slathering, debauched, degenerate dedication to spreading misdirection and misinformation for the sake of wealth, and for adulation from functional morons. The right-wing punditry, even the mainstream media, are abounding with fags. Bill O’Reilly, Melanie Morgan, Brit Hume, George Will: f*ggots all. Stand-up politicians who sacrifice the general welfare, and even lay waste to lives by the thousands, in slavish submission to greed and power-lust  – now that’s faggotry. George Bush? It goes without saying. Dick Cheney? Well, what word could capture his especially venal, uniquely cheneyesque sort of faggotry? I haven’t discovered it yet. Karl Rove. Never mind his rumored affection for male prostitutes. Oh, Mitch McConnell is a definite f*g. He may even be gay. Orin Hatch? I think so – yes and yes. Bill Frist? Oh, yeah! Newt Gingrich? Don’t get me going. The Republican presidential candidates? What’s the word for a group of fags standing together onstage? A gaggle? A faggle? These are not philanthropists. No, these are fags. And the list could go on and on. Some Democrats could qualify of course, though not, I think, so quintessentially. I frankly don’t get the f*g-reference Coulter recently made about John Edwards. He seems like a gentleman, and a typically hetero sort of family man. Maybe she has trouble comprehending gentility.

The word f*g is uniquely powerful and highly evocative. We should take up Coulter’s inspiration and proclaim the essential-existential meaning the word actually expresses. We should identify, we should out true fags in their pride of faggotry. By the process of elimination, gays and lesbians, with normal, virtuous aspirations in life, could be discriminated and liberated from that most sordid identification.

A committed philanthropist deserves the epitaph philanthropist, in recognition of her life’s work and calling.  A loving mother, a nice man, a good neighbor, an athlete, an artist, a musician, a scientist, a philosopher  – these are defining dedications, titles of recognition. A dedicated f*g deserves no less popular recognition, no less personal attention.


Rate It | View Ratings

Jim Arnold Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

A former visitant of UC Santa Cruz, former union boilermaker, ex-Marine, Vietnam vet, anti-war activist, dilettante in science with an earth-shaking theory on the nature of light (which no one will consider), philosopher in the tradition of Schelling, Hegel, Merleau-Ponty, Marx, and Fromm (sigh, no one listens to me on that either), author of a book on wine clubs (ahem), and cast-off programmer of ancient computer languages. I've recently had two physics articles published in an obscure but earnest Central European journal (European Scientific Journal but my main interests remain politics and philosophy.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Thom Hartmann's book on the JFK Assassination

Spartan Women: History's greatest conspiracy?

Is theoretical physics dead-ending?

Immigration Policy: the Liberal/Progressive Dichotomy

Steven Hawking is wrong on Extraterrestrials

Gravitation, force and energy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: