Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Cold Hard 911 Truth

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   9 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 10608
Message Heath Widdowson

. The Cold Hard 911 Truth

Millions of people worldwide are demanding a new investigation of the events of 9-11-2001. They consist of engineers, professors, architects, theologians, former statesmen, military officers, and concerned citizens. They have even discussed it in the Japanese parliament Is there in fact any truth at all to the claims of the “conspiracy theorists?”

Sadly, the answer is a resounding yes. Incredibly, the truth is so glaringly obvious that it does, in fact, beggar belief.

I have to admit it, in the beginning I bought the government's official conspiracy theory, hook line and sinker. After all, I’m a vet, and if there is one thing you learn when you’re in the service it’s that our country’s enemies are real and they mean to do us harm. I will never dispute that. So, when the government said Al Quaeda did it, I bought it, case closed. But in the back of my mind it never fully sat right. There were so many questions, mainly: how did those buildings just collapse like that? I tried to explain it away, to believe the official explanation. But it was a dilemma. After all, those buildings were utterly and completely destroyed! Even the entire underground complex of the WTC (which most people are completely unaware of) was destroyed! Between 2002 and 2003 I started reexamining the evidence available. I started learning about the science behind freefall physics. I started checking the math. You don’t have to be a genius to understand that every kinetic event in the universe can be rendered mathematically. Because of the math, I came to the conclusion that those buildings were demolished. Upon reexamining footage from that day it was obvious. I could see the explosions with my own eyes!

The truth is plain to see once one divorces oneself from the emotion of the event. A heightened emotional state is imperative for the success of any psychological operation, because emotions are active in the lower brain, distinct and separate from the higher analytical brain. Fear and anger are the assassins of logic. If those buildings were never attacked by planes, and there was never a terrorist event, what would it look like if they did demolish those buildings? Think about it. If the WTC towers were demolished legally in a controlled demolition scenario, what would it look like? I attest that it would be a spectacular event, played and replayed on youtube for years to come, and it would look exactly like it did on 911, absent the jet-fuel fires from two airline crashes. You can see the explosions right there in front of your own eyes on the raw CNN footage. Detractors, such as the ones who often post in response to 911 truth internet articles, mean well I’m sure. They don’t want to believe what can be proven even beyond a shadow of a doubt. A jury found a certain famous athlete not guilty of murder even when the police had his DNA at the crime scene. People couldn’t understand the science of it or didn't want to. There was too much emotion involved. For one to think rationally and critically, one cannot be in a heightened emotional state. This was the purpose of those planes hitting the buildings: shock and awe, fear, anger. In that state it’s easy to not see things right in front of your eyes. In that state it’s easy to be hypnotized, more susceptible to suggestion. People have to let go of their egos to admit being fooled. It’s a hard thing to admit you are wrong. I know, I’m a veteran and a patriot; this was hard stuff to swallow. But even I don’t have a big enough ego to tell physics professors and engineers they are wrong and that they are kooks. Nor is my ego so big that I can calmly say that 2+2=5. I have to admit that it equals 4, no matter what the idiots on the boob tube might say. I've had people tell me that, of course, everyone saw that plane hit the pentagon, it was right there on TV, right? Wrong! They saw it in their minds!

Once again, if the towers had been brought down legally in an admitted controlled demolition, what would it look like? I live in Columbia S.C., a capital city. Our tallest building is approximately one fourth as tall as one of those towers. If a plane hit that building I can’t imagine it disintegrating from any sort of subsequent fire, I mean it’s a big building! The two towers of the WTC were so massive that it’s beyond most people’s comprehension. At on time these were the tallest buildings in the world. Hundreds, if not thousands, of explosive devices would have been necessary to destroy it, yet two plane loads of fuel did the trick! Anyone, and I mean anyone, trying to explain that away is peddling junk science. The publication Popular Mechanics tried to peddle this junk science. They even put out a book with a foreword by John McCain. All junk science! They all get Fs in science class. But they get in A in propaganda and war-mongering!

I don't know who is behind the horrific events of 911. I can make an educated guess, because of who benefits: Taylor Caldwell’s “quiet, deadly men” of real power, the “captains and the kings.” But saying that would be a conspiracy theory. However, it’s not a theory that those buildings are gone! In seconds they were gone! Poof! Finito! The combined time involved in the utter destructions of the Twin Towers was less than 30 seconds! Are Americans so complacent, so dumbed down, so “doped on religion, sex, and TV,” as John Lennon put it, that they cannot tell when tyranny has arrived at their doorstep?

Sadly, the answer is a resounding yes.


Rate It | View Ratings

Heath Widdowson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Health care professional and scholar. I consider myself a democrat in the tradtion of FDR and the new deal, but I reject the lable of liberal or progressive, as theses terms have been hijacked and misused in my opinion.
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Cold Hard 911 Truth

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: