Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

And example of the same old same old we need to cauterize

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Message Ed Tubbs
Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

Admittedly the following is to a large measure self serving. Nonetheless, it also serves to epitomize what has been transpiring in our country for too long: cherry picking anecdotal and/or out-of-context evidence by those without the requisite qualifications to comment on a topic for the purpose of advancing an agenda. That I have now encountered it twice in recent days concerning a vocation in which I have had considerable professional experience prompts this rebuttal.


While I will summarize the remarks I will rebut, I invite any who are curious as to the exact remarks to visit (The author of the transgressing comments is Diane Cipa and her email address is:;


Ms. Cipa notes her curriculum vitae as “General Manager of The Closing Specialists®. She has over 30 years of experience in the real estate industry including real estate sales, mortgage lending, and title insurance.”

The offending remarks made by Ms. Cipa on Wednesday, January 2, 2008 are, “’The lesson of the S & L crisis were forgotten….’ will [sic] future generations remember the lessons of the mortgage crisis of 2007? You’ve got to wonder.” “Current regulation of appraisers resulted from the mass failure of S&Ls in the 1980s. A congressional panel concluded that flawed and fraudulent appraisals were major contributors to the losses.” 

In the other (I cannot recall the publication, though it was within the past week.) instance, the author, also referring to the present mortgage meltdown, was chastising appraisers for failing to adequately consider value via the “Replacement Cost Approach.” I’ll deal with that admonishment also.  

It is true that congressional hearings alleged appraisers played a contributing part in a multi-billion dollar taxpayer bailout of an industry that was the direct consequence of Reagan’s push to deregulate everything. But allegations are not requisite of factual representations.  

From 1978 through 1994 I was the owner of a real estate appraisal business in the San Francisco Bay area. For the sole objective of being able to obtain unrestricted sales and listing data, in 1979 I became a licensed California real estate broker; not merely a licensed salesperson, a broker. In 1981, having taken the several professional courses necessary, and having successfully passed the exams, I was awarded two professional designations; ASA and RM — the first from the American Society of Appraisers, the second from the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers.  

Overwhelmingly, real estate appraisers fall into a limited number of employment categories; sole proprietors working on their own, owners of a small business (legally, less than 100 employees — by far, including the owner-appraiser, most have fewer than 10 employees!), and as employees of lending institutions. Moreover, appraisers are financially unaffiliated with each other and are scattered throughout the country. The typical fee for an appraisal of an average single family home in the mid-80s was $100.00 to $200.00. Multi-unit housing and atypical custom homes could cost more to appraise. These facts are absolutely essential to the discussion. 

The art of appraising for current market value is based on uncomplicated principles I’ll illustrate via a simple storage facility example. Storage facilities are found everywhere, meaning in a variety of locations across the country and within the same economic region. Location is primary. It’s easy to understand how proximity to different geographic circumstances in the storage complex and the region can demonstrably affect the price/rental value. The appraiser’s task is to estimate the current worth of a single unit based on comparable other units; units that have sold or rented recently. If Units A, B, and C have rented/sold recently, say for $200.00, $250.00 and $300.00 respectively, and the unit being appraised is larger than A, smaller than C and is the same or most similar to B, the appraised value will approximate $250.00 PERIOD!  

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Ed Tubbs Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

An "Old Army Vet" and liberal, qua liberal, with a passion for open inquiry in a neverending quest for truth unpoisoned by religious superstitions. Per Voltaire: "He who can lead you to believe an absurdity can lead you to commit an atrocity."
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Texas Board of Education: America's Taliban.

Refusing The Call; Will selfish Seniors hand over the USA's future to China?

Merry Christmas-- Ho, Ho, Ho What the Hell

Today's McCarthyism. Will we Stand up Against it, or Stand Down?

ANYone who would vote for Sarah Palin is not an American

"The horror, the horror" -- Health Insurance CEOs Testify in Congress

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend