Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Bush is trying to set up OpEdNews as a "terrorist recruiter."

By       Message Ed Martin       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   38 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 2467
- Advertisement -

Barbara Peterson's Nov. 14 article points out how Bush's Homeland Security is trying to make the case that web sites that publish articles questioning the events of 9/11 are terrorist recruiters.  Given Bush's recourse to calling everyone who doesn't agree with him a terrorist and combined with his executive order confiscating all the worldly goods of anyone who disagrees with him, Barbara Peterson's article didn't get the attention it deserves.

The sinister effect of what Bush is doing is that Barbara's article, this article, and others here on OpEdNews that question the motives of the Bush administration and the events of 9/11 can be determined to be "terrorist recruiters."

I'm quoting and paraphrasing from Barbara's article, but it is well worth repeating.  Here's the part from her article that makes the connection:

At a Homeland Security sub-committee hearing on terrorism risk assessment where the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth website is presented along with Taliban recruitment sites, training manuals and bomb making techniques, Representative Jane Harmon asked Bruce Hoffman, Chairman of the Rand Corporation in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency, "So this movement develops them into violent killers?"  Hoffman stated that, "falsehoods and conspiracy theorists have become so ubiquitous and believed that you almost have some sort of parallel truth, and it has become a very effective tool for recruiting people."

- Advertisement -

Barbara points out that Hoffman is talking about A & E for Truth, calling them conspiracy theorists and equating them with the recruiting sites of the Taliban.

If that were true, which it isn't, Bush could determine that that is an act undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq.

Now, here's the scary part that ties it all together.

- Advertisement -

Bush's Executive Order of July 17, 2007, stripped down to its meaning:

"All property and interests in property of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn or otherwise dealt in, detemined by the Secretary of the Treasury, to pose a significant risk of committing an act undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq."

Does questioning what happened on 9/11 pose a risk of undermining efforts in Iraq?  That's not for us to determine, that's strictly up to Bush and his Treasury Secretary.  We have no say in the matter, but if Bush takes it into his head that we might, could, maybe, possibly pose a risk, we lose everything we have.  All we have to do is ask, "Is that the way it happened?"

Notice the lack of subtlety used by lumping professional architects and engineers in with Taliban terrorists.  Bush is trying to get a handle on a way to shut down anyone who questions what happened on 9/11, starting with the web sites that have the most authoritative, professional people, the ones most likely to get at the truth.  He's afraid if they keep it up, the truth just might come out.

Bush has given it away, here.  By trying to prevent the truth from coming out, by not wanting the truth exposed, he's just making it more obvious that the truth can hurt him.  That's what he's trying to hide.

By applying qui bono, who benefits, to this thing, we can draw some obvious conclusions.  Five months after Bush took office, he was dragging along with a dismal 50% approval rating, and he hadn't even done anything.  There was nothing to approve or disapprove of but the nonentity, Bush, himself.  He was nothing going nowhere.  Right after 9/11, his approval rating shot up to a phenomenal 90% and he had just about the whole country kissing his ass, getting everything he wanted.  And, he became what he always wanted to be, a self-described "War President," using 9/11 as the basis of his lies to create his own, personal war.

- Advertisement -

The events of 9/11 benefited George Bush enormously, more than any other man.  And, he's going to use his executive order to confiscate everything we have to keep us from asking how that came about.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Ed Martin is an ordinary person who is recovering from being badly over-educated. Born in the middle of the Great Depression, he is not affiliated with nor a member of any political, social or religious organization. He is especially interested in (more...)

Ed Martin Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Conyers' year of tolerating contempt

Removal of the President from Office

The twelve powers of a President.

You need to read this! Rob Kall's declaration of war

Textbook descriptions of George Bush reveal psychopathy, and much worse.

The worst is yet to come; foreclosure fraud is the banksters' least problem