For too long, I rationalized my work in politics as a learning experience, a way to find out how politics works from the inside. I attempted to ease my conscience with the knowledge that although I cashed paychecks from Republicans, I never, in fact, was one. I never registered as a Republican, seldom voted for Republicans and maintained as I always have an independent voter status.
I stayed in politics for another five years after leaving the Republicans, running the political action committee (PAC) and other political programs for the National Association of Realtors, rationalizing my independence once again by helping both Democrats and Republicans with huge campaign donations, independent expenditure efforts and other assistance both on and off the books.
By 1992, however, the putrid stench of politics became too much and I walked away.
So too are too many Republicans and Democrats whose campaigns benefited from donations from my PAC or help from my independent expenditure ads.
I don 't consider myself a Republican or Democrat and have equal disdain for members of both parties but most of my anger nowadays is aimed at Republicans because they control the White House and Congress and they must accept the blame for much of what is happening, at this point in time, to America.
Their actions are not only a crime against the Constitution but a crime against humanity, against common decency and against the soul of a once proud nation called America.
America is mired in a war that cannot be won because George W. Bush used manufactured intelligence to sell that war to a Congress that should have asked more questions and demanded more evidence. Republicans and Democrats alike voted to give him the power to wage that war and then sat on their hands and did nothing.
Likewise, both Republicans and Democrats voted for the rights-robbing USA Patriot Act, the law that the Bush administration has used to undermine the Constitution and eat away at the freedoms of all Americans.
And the mainstream media, caught up in the post-911 bloodlust, failed to do its job and ask needed questions before the Iraq war. Both The Washington Post and The New York Times, symbols of liberalism in the eyes of most Republicans and conservatives, supported the war. The New York Times now admits it sat on a story about domestic spying for a year at the White House;s request. Had the Times printed that story last year, before the 2004 elections, would George W. Bush still be President? Good question.
Some of us raised questions before the war. Capitol Hill Blue ran a number of stories, based on reports from anonymous sources within the intelligence community that cast doubt on the accuracy of claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction or that a link had been proven between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. We ran stories last year about the use of the Pentagon and NSA to spy on Americans. Our stories were dismissed by the partisans as just ravings from a nut job with a web site. It didn 't matter that we were right. Attack the source. That 's one of the oldest games in politics.
And it is George W. Bush who arrogantly admitted this weekend that, yes, he authorized the National Security Agency to spy on Americans and, by God, he 'll keep doing it because he 's the President and he can do any damn thing he wants.
Some 10 days ago, we reported that Bush, angry in a meeting where reauthorization of the Patriot Act was questioned, called the Constitution "just a goddamned piece of paper. "