Has a ring to it doesnt it?
Kind of like Napoleon, meet Waterloo.
The deal to turn over six major ports and more to a company from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, provides ammo for Demos and cover for Republicans fleeing Bushs embrace as his approval ratings sink into the 30sjust about rock bottom for modern politics. Even during impeachment, President Clinton never fell so low.
Catcalls from right wing media voices, which alert reader Michael Paskel of Oak Ridge pointed out in recent emails, are equally damaging to Bush. For instance, theres .
Pat Buchanan: Just as sky marshals seat themselves behind young Arab males, not grannies taking the tots to Disney World, so Americans, in deciding who operates their ports, naturally prefer ourselves or old friends.
Or take recent emails published in The Asbury Park Press, a Jersey newspaper that twice endorsed this Bush for president based near one of the ports: Why not sign up Saudi Arabia to manage our airports? They have a lot of guys that know a few things about planes. And why not hire the Mexican police to patrol our borders?--Sal Runfola.
President Bush says he would veto any attempt to block this deal from going through. Where in
God's name is his rationale? His lack of good judgment in sending our children to war with Iraq
would only be superseded by going through with this insanity.--Joe and Marsha Stopko.
Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican and chairwoman of the Senate Homeland Security
Committee, said, "Although the UAE is an ally in the war on terrorism, the country has historically been used as a base of terrorist operations and financing."
Pretty damning, but not as damning as ultra conservative Anne Coulter, who wrote, Bush's
defense of the port deal is to say that those who are questioning it need to step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company. First of all, it's not all of a sudden. The phrase you're searching for, Mr. President, is ever since the murderous attacks of Sept. 11 attacks that received indirect support from the United Arab Emirates .
Buchanan again: The real question this deal raises is what happened to the political antenna at the White House. Did it fall off the roof about the time President Bush named Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court?
Surely, before approving this deal with Dubai Ports World, someone should have asked: How do you think Bubba will react when he's told sheiks will take over the port of Baltimore, where, in Tom Clancy's 'Sum of All Fears,' Arab terrorists smuggle in an A-bomb and detonate it?"
Despite the uproar, it isnt hard to imagine Bush restoring luster to the crown that landed on his
head like a bad cosmic joke in 2000. Bush and advisor Karl Rove are wily coyotes and the public
is fickle, half-informed and forgiving, and so weve become used to this pattern:
Bush, Cheney or underlings perpetrate some outrage, the media angrily protest, Congress erupts in loud dissent, Bush replies with a Sunday morning media blitz, Big Media fall all over themselves to repeat his line, Congress backs down, bin Laden emerges or a Yellow Alert washes the controversy off the front page. Its happened over and over. WMDs, torture, wiretapping, New Orleans, secret energy deals, Valerie Plames ouster, Harriet Miers, Halliburton corruption, environmental desecration, the prescription drug sell-out, Cheney shooting the old guy, Bushs military record, on and on. Bushs many rises from the ashes are worthy of a latter day
Napoleon. Still, one can dream that Frist will stand firm, the media will not go wobbly and the public at last will see whats been obvious to many from the start. The emperor has no clothes. As Buchanan concluded, This episode is going to end badly.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).