Has a ring to it doesn 't it?
The deal to turn over six major ports and more to a company from Dubai, United Arab Emirates, provides ammo for Demos and cover for Republicans fleeing Bush 's embrace as his approval ratings sink into the 30s --just about rock bottom for modern politics. Even during impeachment, President Clinton never fell so low.
Lots of conservatives and lots of Republicans --notably Tennessee 's senior senator, Majority Leader Bill Frist --are not down with this deal, so to speak.
Catcalls from right wing media voices, which alert reader Michael Paskel of Oak Ridge pointed out in recent emails, are equally damaging to Bush. For instance, there 's ....
Or how about The Weekly Standard magazine, a bastion of neo-conservative opinion, where Irwin Stelzer sensibly observed, "Two of the attackers on the World Trade Center were citizens of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), of which Dubai is a component state; Dubai is alleged to be home to some of the banks that laundered money for the attackers; and A.Q. Kahn's nuclear-smuggling network hid behind a Dubai front. " Ouch.
Or take recent emails published in The Asbury Park Press, a Jersey newspaper that twice endorsed this Bush for president based near one of the ports: "Why not sign up Saudi Arabia to manage our airports? They have a lot of guys that know a few things about planes. And why not hire the Mexican police to patrol our borders? "--Sal Runfola.
"President Bush says he would veto any attempt to block this deal from going through. Where in
God's name is his rationale? His lack of good judgment in sending our children to war with Iraq
would only be superseded by going through with this insanity. "--Joe and Marsha Stopko.
Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican and chairwoman of the Senate Homeland Security
Committee, said, "Although the UAE is an ally in the war on terrorism, the country has historically been used as a base of terrorist operations and financing."
Pretty damning, but not as damning as ultra conservative Anne Coulter, who wrote, "Bush's
defense of the port deal is to say that 'those who are questioning it ' need to 'step up and explain why all of a sudden a Middle Eastern company is held to a different standard than a Great British company. ' First of all, it's not 'all of a sudden. ' The phrase you're searching for, Mr. President, is 'ever since the murderous attacks of Sept. 11 ... ' attacks that received indirect support from the United Arab Emirates .... "
Buchanan again: "The real question this deal raises is what happened to the political antenna at the White House. Did it fall off the roof about the time President Bush named Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court?
Despite the uproar, it isn 't hard to imagine Bush restoring luster to the crown that landed on his
head like a bad cosmic joke in 2000. Bush and advisor Karl Rove are wily coyotes and the public
is fickle, half-informed and forgiving, and so we 've become used to this pattern:
Bush, Cheney or underlings perpetrate some outrage, the media angrily protest, Congress erupts in loud dissent, Bush replies with a Sunday morning media blitz, Big Media fall all over themselves to repeat his line, Congress backs down, bin Laden emerges or a Yellow Alert washes the controversy off the front page. It 's happened over and over. WMDs, torture, wiretapping, New Orleans, secret energy deals, Valerie Plame 's ouster, Harriet Miers, Halliburton corruption, environmental desecration, the prescription drug sell-out, Cheney shooting the old guy, Bush 's military record, on and on. Bush 's many rises from the ashes are worthy of a latter day
Napoleon. Still, one can dream that Frist will stand firm, the media will not go wobbly and the public at last will see what 's been obvious to many from the start. The emperor has no clothes. As Buchanan concluded, "This episode is going to end badly. "