Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Health Care Reforms and Stolen Elections

By David Weiner  Posted by Joan Brunwasser (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
The last two U.S. elections were stolen (by more than 93,000 recorded, but unregistered votes in one Ohio county in 2004, according to Prof. Dennis Lou of Cal Poly University.) This contention no longer strikes anyone as anything but stark fact. The mildness of Democrats' reaction to these thefts even amazes Republicans. Ultimately, the only rational conclusions to be drawn seem to be (1) that Democratic Partly leadership sold out, and/or (2) that Democratic Party organization exists only as illusion. In a recent Democracy Now interview, Mark Crispin reveals that John Edwards, furious at Kerry's quick concession, was forced to accept it -- and keep quiet about it. Apparently Edwards felt he had no place to turn for support.

Evidence supporting both propositions exists to such a degree, in fact, that many young liberals and progressives claim that continuing to practice party politics as usual is to engage in an exercise of denial. Significantly, they no longer get angrily written off by the more conservative core of the Party as naive trouble makers. That the Party must heal itself, must forge a united focus, with new leadership can be felt as a pre-volcanic rumble threatening at any moment to erupt into a real movement -- finally.

Some feel that the election thefts and the certainty of more in the future constitute plenty of motivation for such a movement -- no other catalyst is necessary. Unfortunately, history teaches that people rarely mobilize to redress a wrong when their own leaders quit the field. Citizens seem to need a dynamic, positive goal to unite and ignite them.

Pulling out of Iraq might constitute a unifying goal if it included comprehensively revising U.S. foreign policy. At present, however, Democrats disagree widely concerning how a pull-out should be handled and even more widely about foreign policy in general. Protecting the Bill of Rights could be a unifying goal as part of a dynamic, ritualistic, massive reaffirmation of the Constitution. But Democrats vary greatly in their degree of alarm over applications of the Patriot Act and other anti-constitutional Neocon policies.

The idea of recreating the Democratic Party from the ground up unifies some progressives, but these activists are divided over strategy. Some want to mount a revolution within the Party, others to build an external organization bent upon pressuring the Party further to the left. In any event, most Democrats remain content to operate within the party's existing framework, remaining loyal to the DNC if not to the DLC. Other goals that unify all Democrats, unequally, are education reform, social security stabilization, and the stemming of job-loss to workers abroad. Because Democrats differ significantly in terms of how these issues affect them as individuals, the degree of energy they are willing to expend upon them varies as well. Many feel that job loss in particular -- more than 2 million manufacturing jobs since 1998, according to AFL-CIO President John Sweeny addressing the National Press Club on Jan 18 of this year -- is an issue that transcends party politics.

One issue alone unites all liberals and progressives (rationally, all citizens), ranks at or near the top of everyone's set of priorities and falls solidly within the sphere of Democratic party politics: the need for a system of government controlled universal health care in the United States. The number of uninsured Americans varies between 20 and 60 million depending on how one poses the question. According to Susan Starr Sered and Rushika Fernandopulle, authors of Uninsured in America, the figure most often reported in 2003 was 47.3 million. The January 19, 2006 Stanford Daily reports that "45 million Americans are uninsured" and "the United States spends more on health care than other industrialized nations with universal health insurance."

Notwithstanding declarations by some high ranking Party officials that this is an unfeasible goal, most of the rank and file view it as an altogether doable objective,given sufficient resolve. This issue, moreover, cuts across lines of class (at least all strata below the wealthy elite), race, ethnicity, sexual preference and gender. It potentially mobilizes the grass-roots and provides political purchase for leaders such as Congressmen Howard Dean and Dennis Kucinich, and wealthy financier George Soros. It has such strong appeal across such a wide base that even a Republican controlled media could hardly neutralize its power once it gained a little momentum.

As an intense, all-out, in-your-face,no-holds-barred, do-or-die, "accentuating the positive", political issue, Health Care reform lends itself perfectly to internet organizing. If groups such as Moveon defined Health Care Reform as a necessary, if not sufficient platform commitment -- insisting that only candidates who endorsed it would be supported -- it might well be possible to create a grass-roots movement on the left with real political clout, at last. A movement capable of protecting itself from big Pharm and other corporate abusers. A movement capable as well of protecting the public against the loss of its Constitutional rights, such as the right to an honest vote.

Such a movement might grow strong enough to ensure that the nation's leaders were sane, competent, and committed to representing, rather than ruling the citizenry. Health Care Reform, quite conceivably, could heal the Democratic Party -- and the nation.

David Weiner, who teaches sociology and social psychology at Austin Community College, has also taught high school and served as a community organizer and anti-racism activist for more than half a century. He can be reached at Or visit his website at
Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend