Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Is Karl Rove desperate, crazy or a genius?

By       Message Carlos T Mock     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 2458
- Advertisement -
In a speech made on September 6, 2006 to an audience that included some 9/11 victims' family members President George W. Bush acknowledged Wednesday that 14 of the most notorious terrorism suspects had been held and interrogated in secret CIA camps.

"Having a CIA program for questioning terrorists will continue to be crucial to getting lifesaving information," he said.

- Advertisement -
Bush's statement is the first official acknowledgment of the camps. Revelation of their existence last year by The Washington Post had created tensions with complicit governments that, publicly, had denied their existence. The president said simply that "a small number of terrorist suspects" had been held and questioned outside the United States in a "special program" by the Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA camps were believed to be in East Europe, the Middle East and Asia, and to have accommodated anywhere from scores of people to 1,000 or more at some point. Bush said that he could not divulge the camps' location or any other details, to avoid retribution against U.S. allies.

Also Wednesday, in a decisive retreat from practices made infamous by the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, the U.S. Army explicitly banned several interrogation techniques and required all members of the military to observe, "at a minimum," the code set out in the Geneva conventions to protect suspects.

A new U.S. Army manual released Wednesday, which had been withheld for more than a year amid criticism of the Defense Department's treatment of prisoners, explicitly bans eight interrogation techniques: forced nudity or sexual acts, use of hoods or duct tape; beatings; electric shock; the simulated drowning known as "waterboarding," heat or temperature distress; withholding food or water; mock executions; and the use of dogs for intimidation, but not for maintaining security.

We have the President of the United States publicly admitting that he has committed heinous crimes against nature, our armed forces admitting that they specifically encourage torture until yesterday when they the approved the new manuals-thus being directly responsible for the abuses of Abu Ghraib. And this is supposed to make it all right? We are supposed to condone war crimes? We are supposed to trust President Bush or his party?

- Advertisement -
I ask again: Is Karl Rove desperate, crazy or a genius? Is there no shame left in this country? Bush's people obviously think that by distracting us from their failings in Iraq and Katrina, they'll not get slaughtered in the upcoming elections. I pray for the sake of humanity they are not correct.
- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It
Travel website: The Pink Agenda. Several Blogs. Weekly newsletter, available upon request. Publications - Fiction: Borrowing Time: A Latino Sexual Odyssey - Floricanto Press 2003. Poetry: The Refined Savage Poetry Review - Refined Savage (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sexual Addiction

Gay Rights during the Bush Presidency

History of Same Sex Marriage Jurisprudence


Puerto Ricans must address America's race and class divide

Puerto Rico, Past , Present, and "Future"