Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

The CEO Presidency

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bob Burnett       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   7 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 93
Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -

In 2000, when George W. Bush first ran for President, one of his selling points was the claim he would be America’s first “CEO President.”  Of course, Bush’s assertion was far from the truth, but for most voters the notion of an effective executive running the White House has enduring appeal.  Looking at Clinton, McCain, and Obama, who would be a CEO President?

 

 

As none of the three remaining candidates have been business executives, any assessment of how they would perform as America’s CEO requires that we rate them on their managerial attributes.  In the business world corporate executives are typically graded on four performance measures: making a profit, reducing costs, making good decisions, and developing a strategic vision.

- Advertisement -

 

Making a Profit:  Unless you are a military contractor, the Federal government is not a profit-making enterprise.  Instead of asking our Presidents to maximize stockholder return, Americans expect them to ensure government “does its job.” Republicans and Democrats have different notions of what that job is.  From the Republican perspective the role of government is to keep us safe and get out of the way – let the free market operate without restrictions.  Democrats agree with the need to keep America safe, but advocate the federal government take a more expansive domestic role: for example, protecting the environment and providing health care.  As a result of these ideological differences, candidate McCain operates with a much different idea of the role of the Federal government than do candidates Clinton or Obama and he would be a different kind of CEO.  He wants to reduce services and they want to improve them.

 

- Advertisement -

Reducing Costs: Corporate executives are under constant pressure to reduce the costs of doing business.  Presidential candidates talk about cutting taxes by reducing the costs of the Federal government.  Republicans advocate a simplistic formula: reducing taxes will inevitably cause the Federal bureaucracy to shrink – except for the Department of Defense.  Democrats speak of eliminating wasteful programs – including those in DOD – but they also advocate raising taxes on the rich in order to finance important social programs such as health care. 

 

On these first two measures, the differences between candidates are ideological rather than managerial.  McCain would continue the Bush doctrines – low taxes, big debt, limited Federal services – while Clinton and Obama would not.

 

 

Decision Making: Corporate CEOs rise or fall on their ability to make difficult decisions under pressure.  During his presidency, George W. Bush was confronted with four major decisions – 9/11, Iraq, Hurricane Katrina, and the economic recession – and proved dreadfully ineffective.  While it’s difficult to predict the grave decisions that will confront the next President, it’s clear that he or she will have to deal with Iraq, Afghanistan, the economy, the consequences of global climate change, and America’s deteriorating infrastructure, at a minimum.  Here the differences between the two Parties are extreme: McCain advocates the plodding “stay the course” policies that have “guided” the last eight years; it’s not clear that he would represent a significant difference from the Bush and there are indications that because of his short temper he might be worse.

- Advertisement -

 

Clinton and McCain tout their Washington experience as having prepared them to be President; they claim Obama is not adequately seasoned.  However, time served in Congress does not always result in a heightened ability to make difficult decisions.  Both Clinton and McCain supported the invasion of Iraq, while Obama did not; and Clinton and McCain support extreme military action against Iran, while Obama does not.  In November, voters will have to predict Presidential decision making based upon “experience” versus “judgment.”

 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. In a previous life he was one of the executive founders of Cisco Systems.

Bob Burnett Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Telltale Signs of Republican Disease

Big Liars and The Voters Who Love Them

Obama vs. Romney: The Bottom Line

The GOP Chooses Fascism

2011 Budget Battle: Obama Wins While Democrats Lose

Obama vs. Romney: The Popularity Contest