Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

CA voters file lawsuit to Halt use or purchase of Diebold Electronic voting system

By Voter Action  Posted by Joan Brunwasser (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
California Voters, including Dolores Huerta, File Lawsuit to Halt Use or Purchase of Diebold Electronic Voting System

Illegal Computer Code, Security and Disability Access Problems Cited

For Immediate Release: San Francisco, March 21, 2006 - A group of 24 California voters, including Dolores Huerta, social justice activist and co-founder of the United Farm Workers of America, announced at a news conference today that they have filed a lawsuit against California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson to nullify his "conditional" certification of the Diebold TSx electronic voting system and to block purchase or use of the TSx in California due to serious security, verifiability and disability access problems.

"The right to a secure vote, which is recorded and counted as intended, is a basic tenet of our democracy, and Californians deserve no less," said Dolores Huerta, social activist and Plaintiff in the California voters' lawsuit. "Diebold systems have failed in security tests and in communities around the country. In certifying the Diebold machines, the Secretary has sidestepped his duty to deny certification to voting systems that violate state and federal standards."

"A crisis is brewing in California when computerized slot machines used by gamblers in the state are more secure and auditable than the electronic voting systems used by California voters to decide the future direction of their government," said Lowell Finley, Esq., counsel for the plaintiffs and co-director of Voter Action. "Expert testing has confirmed that the Diebold system contains "interpreted" code --programming that is vulnerable to malicious hacking, and prohibited by the California Elections Code. The Diebold touch screen voting system is a severe security risk, and does not accommodate all disabled voters as required by law."

"California voters have the right to vote and to have their votes counted correctly. The last thing we need is to start using voting machines that deny access to disabled voters and create an unacceptable risk of fraud and vote manipulation," said John Eichhorst, co-counsel for the voter plaintiffs, and a partner with Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin.

"People with low vision want meaningful access, not token access, in our voting experience," said Bernice Kandarian, President of the Council of Citizens with Low Vision International. "Just because I need an accessible voting system does not mean that I believe that it is acceptable to vote on a system that is not trustworthy and hard to recount or audit. I too want to know that my vote will be counted by the most secure method. The Diebold machines are not only insecure and hard to recount or audit, but they also fail to provide meaningful access for many disabled voters."

The lawsuit also challenges the Secretary of State's imposition of "conditions" to the certification which seek to impose new physical security requirements and liability responsibility upon County Election Officials.

"The Secretary of State's conditions are new, untested, regulations that were adopted without the benefit of appropriate expert analysis and public hearing. These new regulations are not the cure for the acknowledged vulnerabilities built into this voting system," said Mr. Eichhorst.

As part of their case, the plaintiffs will present the expert testimony of computer security experts Douglas W. Jones of the University of Iowa and Dr. Aviel D. Rubin of Johns Hopkins University concerning the serious security problems inherent in the Diebold TSx technology.

"Voter Action is pleased to support this important lawsuit, which will be watched closely by states across the country facing or soon to face similar voting security issues and rushed purchasing decisions. We know from the research of independent experts that Diebold technology is not the answer. There are better, less expensive and secure options that do meet the needs of those with a wide range of disabilities, "says Holly Jacobson, co-director of Voter Action.

The lawsuit was filed with support from Voter Action, a non-profit organization providing legal, research, and logistical support for grassroots efforts to ensure the integrity of elections in the United States. The action was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in San Francisco, prior to the Voter Action news conference at the offices of the Howard Rice law firm in San Francisco.

Voter Action,, is a project of the International Humanities Center with members across the country. Voter Action recently led successful litigation in New Mexico to block purchase and use of the types of voting machines that are most error prone and vulnerable to tampering. In addition to California, Voter Action is currently supporting similar efforts in New York, Pennsylvania and other states.

Voter Action is a project of IHCenter

Views expressed in submissions to this email list are those of the submitter and do not necessarily reflect those of the forwarding organization.
And, we are a planet of many views, beliefs, illusions, and allegiances, all of which deserve their time, place, and space to be heard and considered on their individual merit.
Those taking issue with statements made herein are welcome to rebut by submitting comments to
Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend