Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News   

What's Good for Boeing is Good for America

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   No comments
Author 8890
Message Michael Fury

Remember this?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/09/wsad09.xml

Almost five years later this incident blurs into many like it in Iraq and Afghanistan. Something about the way an entire neighborhood was laid waste by four 2,000 lb bombs in a failed attempt to kill one man struck me as uncomfortably close to the US State Department definition of "terrorism".

Here's an account from the perspective of the pilot of the B-1B that executed this mission, the disarmingly named "Lt. Col. Swan":

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/030409-saddam-kill01.htm

The "fate of the butcher" was unknown, as were the fates of any unwitting human beings within a quarter mile of him.

"I didn't know who was there, and I really didn't care," Swan said. "The job was to go put the bombs on the target and worry about that later." Spoken like a true professional.

Well, "later" is finally here and Yankee ingenuity saves the day:

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3761691&page=1

The claim that enthusiastic application of the "SDB" will result in less collective "collateral damage" in the coming years of occupation relies, of course, on the sort of optimism one learns to associate with professional "warfighters" like Col. Swan. As US ground forces in Iraq consolidate into the numerous permanent bases that have been built with billions of US tax dollars while Congress pretended to debate a "timetable for withdrawal", what this really means is more frequent use of air strikes--especially in urban areas--to enforce "stability". 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-10-21-airstrikes_N.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/16/AR2008011604148_pf.html

And "stability" has been very, very good for "defense" contractors like Boeing:

http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/missiles/sdb/index.html

http://www.govexec.com/features/0807-15/0807-15s3s1.htm

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.aspx?Feed=ACBJ&Date=20080130&ID=8114306&Symbol=US:BA

What was that President Eisenhower said on his way out of the White House? Some embarassing, paranoid rant about a "military industrial complex", wasn't it?

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Fury Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Igniter of brush-fires in the minds of men.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Meet the New Boss

What's Good for Boeing is Good for America

Open Letter to John Conyers