John Nichols Wed Sep 26, 11:50 PM ET
The link to this flash video was removed for security reasons var lrec_altURL="click here var lrec_altimg="http://ads.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ya/yahoo_smallbusiness/072407_unity_300x250.gif"; var lrec_w=300;var lrec_h=250; <a href="click here target="_top"><img src="http://ads.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ya/yahoo_smallbusiness/072407_unity_300x250.gif" width="300" height="250" border="0"></a> if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['eXU3LkSOxJE-']='&U=13b9ofjm2%2fN%3deXU3LkSOxJE-%2fC%3d566543.10932950.11518848.1442997%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d4761299'; <img width=1 height=1 alt="" src="click here
In many states across the country -- including the "Live Free or Die" state of New Hampshire -- there is genuine disdain for the federal government policy that requires states to set the minimum age for purchasing and consuming alcohol at 21.
By threatening to withhold highway funds, the feds have forced states that historically have set the drinking age at 18 -- respecting the fact that if a young man or woman can be trusted to defend the nation as a member of the military, can he held responsible for his or her debts and can marry and have children, that individual should be trusted to buy a beer and drink it responsibly.
During Wednesday night's Democratic presidential debate at Dartmouth, a question from avoter put the drinking-age question on the table.
Would any of the candidates favor ending the practice of using federal highway funds to strongarm states into setting higher drinking ages -- on the theory that it is wrong to "trust (18 year olds) to make life and death decisions in the military" but not to drink responsibly?
called the idea "counterproductive." Translation: "No."
No one applauded.
Connecticutreplied, "I agree with Joe," and then somehow veered into a discussion of smoking.
Again, no applause.
proposed a "dual approach," which sounded good but ended up as another "No."
, Illinois and former North Carolina also indicated that they were in the camp that says an American can die for his or her country but not sip a cocktail.
Finally, two candidates, former Alaskaand Ohio , answered "Yes."
Gravel said, "Anyone who will fight and die for this country should be able to drink."
Kucinich said, "Of course they should be able to vote at age 18, and they should be able to vote at age 16."
Applause and a few laughs.
Chances are that few votes will turn on the question of 18-year-old drinking.
But, it should be noted that, in addition to military service, marriage and money, 18 years olds are also trusted with the franchise. And the illogical response of most of the leading candidates may yet drive us all to drink.
Gravel and Kucinich got it right. If you can be trusted to fight and die, and vote, for your country, you can be trusted to buy a beer.