Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply
sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Guest Blogged by John Gideon of VotersUnite.org
We were encouraged earlier this year when two states announced their plans to do a complete review of their voting system. California has now completed their "Top-To-Bottom Review" and has taken action on all but the three Document Review papers that have yet to be released. Ohio got off to a slow start with their "Evaluation and Validation of Election Related Equipment, Standards and Testing" (EVEREST). It's hard to figure out what is happening and how valid this project will now be. The State Controlling Board has now given SoS Brunner the money she needs to conduct the project but they have thrown in some questionable requirements. Local election officials now have an advisory role in the testing and a say in any recommendations. The Board has also provided the technical testing standards that will be used and requires participants in the study to have insurance to make sure counties don't have to pay to repair or replace any machines damaged by tests. Two weeks ago they were concerned about the bias of some academics who were involved in the project. Now they are building bias into the whole system....
NAtional: Voting system requirements should be technology-neutral LINK
NAtional: Civil Rights Groups Oppose Nomination of Hans von Spakovsky to FEC LINK
CA: San Francisco Editorial - Polling purgatory LINK
OH: Summit County - Ruling awaited on late ballots; absentee tally begins LINK
**"Daily Voting News" is meant as a comprehensive listing of reports each day concerning issues related to election and voting news around the country regardless of quality or political slant. Therefore, items listed in "Daily Voting News" may not reflect the opinions of VotersUnite.Org or OpEdNews.Com**