The elder Bush, a former CIA Director himself, is known to have said in 1999, that those who betray the trust by exposing the names of our sources" are "the most insidious of traitors.
How must the father feel now that he knows his son is the leader of a gang of the most insidious of traitors?
The American taxpayers who paid for the investigation to determine the identities of the insidious traitors deserve to know what happened to Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald between October 28, 2005 and June 13, 2006. Back when he announced the Scooter Libby indictment, he said Valerie Plame's CIA status was classified and not common knowledge. At his October press conference, Fitzgerald specifically told reporters:
In an August 27, 2005 affidavit, filed in the Libby case, Fitzgerald described Valerie Plame as a person whose identity the CIA was making specific efforts to conceal and who had carried out covert work overseas within the last 5 years.
Fitzgerald has identified Karl Rove as one of Novak's sources. In fact, according to court filings, Rove was the person who told Scooter Libby that Novak was planning to write a story about Wilson before it was published. And as it turns out, Rove was Time Magazine's Matt Cooper's source as well.
One thing is clear. The "Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement," Forms SF-312, signed by members of the Bush administration are not worth the paper they are written on. Rove signed that form as a condition of employment and it prohibits even confirming or repeating classified information already leaked. The briefing book that comes with the form states in relevant part:
Before confirming the accuracy of what appears in the public source, the signer of the SF 312 must confirm through an authorized official that the information has, in fact, been declassified. If it has not, confirmation of its accuracy is also an unauthorized disclosure.
Since day one, when Plames identity showed up in the press, there have been lies, upon lies, upon more lies from members of the Bush administration
On September 29, 2003, during a public press conference, press secretary, Scott McClellan told the world in regard to any White House involvement in the leak:
"There's been nothing, absolutely nothing, brought to our attention to suggest any White House involvement, and that includes the vice president's office, as well."
McClellan assured Americans that "if anyone in this administration was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration."
In regard to Rove being involved, McClellan said the "President knows" it is not true and then told world:
"And I said it is simply not true. So, I mean, it's public knowledge. I've said that it's not true. And I have spoken with Karl Rove ... He [President Bush]'s aware of what I've said, that there is simply no truth to that suggestion. And I have spoken with Karl about it."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).