Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 34 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/19/20

Zionist Attacks Continue on Director Ken Loach

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Message James Wall
Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

From Wallwritings

(Image by   Details   DMCA

Israeli politics shine no light on the darkness of oppression.

Take the career of Ken Loach, a film director who exposes injustice on and off screen. He has long been a constant warrior against Zionist oppression

On April 1, Tom Suarez wrote a detailed analysis for Mondoweiss that traces Loach's career. He begins:

    "Two years ago, during a talk I gave about Palestine at the Bath Royal Literary and Scientific Institution, British filmmaker Ken Loach raised a most essential question. Paraphrasing, he asked, 'Where do we go from here?' The gist of my reply: We must first expose Israel's front-line weapon against justice for Palestine, its cynical misuse of the smear of antisemitism. So long as we respond to this abuse on its own terms, the weapon is foolproof. It hijacks the discourse away from Israel's crimes regardless of the efficacy of the smears. Israel's crimes, and even the 'P' word Palestine or the Palestinians remain off-limits.

    "We must instead stop allowing Israel to control the terms of our response. Instead, we must turn the tables and accuse the accusers of antisemitism for exploiting Jewish identity in the service of injustice.

    "But Ken Loach's own recent brush with the weapon demonstrates the barriers to speaking that simple truth."...

For Suarez' full article, click here.

Loach made Kes, in the late 1960s, which was given a limited U.S. release in 1973. The poster above highlights Loach's focus on the oppressed early in his career. The Israel Lobby knew of Loach's political passion, which could account for its limited exposure. Roger Ebert loved Kes and wrote a review which listed the honors it received in England.

In his review, Ebert continues:

    "But it was never released commercially in America. For that matter, it never got very good bookings in England, either the distributors were afraid that audiences wouldn't understand the movie's Yorkshire accents. This is the typical sort of blind muddling that seems to go on, whenever a good film comes along that's slightly out of the ordinary; nobody was afraid of Michael Caine's accent in Alfie, maybe because Alfie had enough sex scenes to carry the day.

    "None of this would be important if Kes were not one of the best, the warmest, the most moving films of recent years. After a couple of years in limbo, it was finally picked up for 16-mm distribution in 1972... it's perhaps inevitable that it took Loyola's Biological Honor Society to arrange the booking. Were they interested in the movie, or the kestrel?"

In his review Roger missed the Lobby connection or perhaps the Lobby was below his radar screen? The poster above from Director Ken Loach cries out for the connection to be made.

Here is a longer segment from his review:


Ebert January 16, 1973

"It isn't often that Academy Award winners completely fail to open in Chicago, but that's what happened with 'Kes.' In the event that the movie's name doesn't exactly sound familiar, I should add that 'Kes' won the 1970 British Academy Award, as England's best film of the year. It picked up a lot of other honors, too, including the grand prize at Edinburgh and lots of praise at the 1970 New York Film Festival. But it was never released commercially in America.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

James Wall Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

James Wall served as a Contributing Editor of The Christian Century magazine, based in Chicago, Illinois, from 1999 through 2017. From 1972 through 1999, he was editor and publisher of the Christian Century magazine. Many sources have influenced (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Does Israel Interfere in US Elections?

New York Times Flacks for Jewish Groups Against 15 Major Christian Leaders

How Iran Could Be The Next Neocon Target

Ten Swing States Could Decide the 2012 Election; Obama Leads in Nine of Them

White Evangelicals Stifle Values For Trump

What Protestants Could Learn from Ron Paul

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend