Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts    H4'ed 4/3/19

Words matter: Lessons from High School Speech Class

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   5 comments
Author 513220
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michele Goddard

translation
translation
(Image by trendingtopics)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

I didn't like my high school speech teacher. She was a loud and boisterous woman who wore bright clothes and a lot of makeup and being also the drama coach made her classroom her stage.

I was a quiet and reserved student and of course, somewhat apprehensive about public speaking. To make matters worse Mrs. Mikasen felt it her obligation to bring students like me "out of our shell" helping us, she believed by having us perform some "drills" designed to help us "get over" our fear. These somewhat embarrassing impromptu activities, did nothing to alleviate my dread of public speaking and only served to make me see her more as my mortal enemy than as a learned instructor.

Maybe her tactics worked on some, but my confidence to speak publicly came later as a result of confidence in myself not from desensitizing me to humiliation. In any event, in retrospect, this annoying woman taught me some life changing things about speech and for that I feel a lasting gratitude towards her.

- Advertisement -

Lesson 1:

Words matter. They are far more than physical representations of speech. They do more than merely encapsulate the qualities of objects, they express the very ideas and emotions that we possess in our souls. Furthermore, word choice has context. Historical and cultural contexts are the reason memes and jokes will get a laugh at home while leaving a foreigner, though well versed in the language itself, still scratching their heads. Our language is an expression of our ideas but our word choice reveals the more specific lens with which we view the world. Our perspective, and often our bias, is exposed through our chosen terminology, our cultural "dialects".

As our political tribalism increases, so does our tendency to recognize and react positively to the shared language of our ideological peers and to react negatively when we hear the "language" perceived as that of our "enemies". The use of a term, one or two words can reveal your entire stance on an issue. Occupied territories vs. settlements, or even the connotations each tribe ascribes to a single word - like socialist.

- Advertisement -

Response to language triggers is often intense and immediate. Charged words are regularly slung like arrows by pundits and politicians to intentionally provoke division. While at other times these verbal grenades explode in the face of the thrower due to their failure recognize the language they are using carries such inflammatory connotations.

One recent example of this was the controversy which erupted over Ilhan Omars comments about Israel. There were many lenses through which the comments took on a different hue. There is the lens through which Jewish people view her words, having personally experienced the ramifications of anti-Semitic language. Others who, not having had such an experience, see her words merely as a blunt and honest criticism of the often taboo subject of Israeli policy towards Palestine.

There is also the non-verbal, more visual lens arising out of the shifting demographics of the United States which focuses on the source of the criticism: a newly elected Muslim, a woman, a person of color, being defiant to the traditional, white, Judeo-Christian, male dominated power structures. This audacity was too much for some. Her speech was not only controversial for its word choice but also for the cultural context in which those words were spoken, making the polarization that much more exaggerated.

This is why we can not come to an agreement on what her words meant or were intended to mean. Through any given lens what is the truth can appear different. Each of those lenses carries with it an entire history and culture. To deny the perspective of an individual is to then to deny the validity of that person. When the perspectives of cultures/tribes collide, emotions heighten. Fear and hostility drive the tribes into their respective camps and their language becomes even more couched in their specific bias.

One day we came into class Mrs. Mikasen came around and handed us index cards instructing us to pick one but not to look at it. Of course I thought there was some silly activity on it we would be forced to perform. She told us to stand up and lay the card on the floor in front of us. Each of us would flip our card over, read the word and then stomp on it with our feet. Of course it sounded ridiculous. As the we flipped the cards over, the ones labeled "car" or "house" drew no reaction, and were simply stomped on. However words like mother, baby, America and of course God gave most of us pause. Some couldn't or wouldn't stomp on the cards with these words because in our tribe these words have a sacred attachment to them.

This exercise showed the us that although our conscious minds recognize these are mere ink marks on index cards, they are also much more than that. Words are symbols that have power. Immediately upon recognition of the words they transcend the paper and become more. They become the very embodiment of all that the word represents to us and in a group setting, causes us to be cautious of what others will think of how we use and respect that word or idea. What will my peers think of me if I can stomp a paper that says baby on it? What will my tribe think if I stomp.on a word like "God"?

- Advertisement -

In the 24 hour, rapid fire news cycle, we are flooded with so much information it is hard to even digest it but one thing which we do absorb is the bias created by the tribal language that surrounds us. Whatever your given news source, you will be catered to and spoken to in "your" language. This only breeds more tribalism.

Those who understand that language can divide us into tribes and who seek to herd us into a given tribe for their purposes are forceful in using their words controlling the narrative.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michele Goddard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I was born in 1970 in Wheeling, WV and have lived here all my life. I come from mostly Irish Catholic coal miners and railroad workers. My original academic interest was in teaching foreign languages studying both French and Spanish in High (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The War of Words - Global Tribe and the Fall of Propaganda

Rednecks with Short Memories - West Virginia, Birthplace of Democratic Socialism

Why We Need Bernie Sanders

Words matter: Lessons from High School Speech Class

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments


Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 2 articles, 12 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

By developing increased awareness of the increased tribalism in our speech patterns we will be less susceptible to the manipulation of the media, the government and those with whom we converse and debate. By becoming less indoctrinated by our own tribes our minds are more open and receptive and we are better listeners. We can still have conviction in our ideas, but have the courage to test them and makemtjem stronger on their merits rather than out of "brand loyalty". This is the path to regaining control of the political narrative and moving it forward.

Submitted on Wednesday, Apr 3, 2019 at 11:15:34 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 2410 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

There's more than just "words" going on here. It's also "language" and "framing", and NARRATIVE.

For instance, with things like promoting Guaido, it's not so much that your government is attempting to impose some "accepted form" of "terminology". They're blatantly attempting to push a complete LIE, simply by the process of "repetition" (persistence). They're only stating their case as if they were "correcting" some false conception, which is one of today's popular methods of CREATING a false conception.

Every technique now being employed by the powerful has the central focus of controlling the very narratives we're supposed to believe. At the end of the day, they're simply LYING.

You also see the complete across-the-board use of euphemistic boilerplate language, which actually amounts to saying nothing useful at all. The jargon completely consumes not only politics, but corporate-public relations as well. It's as disgusting as it is disingenuous.

Submitted on Thursday, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:46:15 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 2 articles, 12 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Devil's Advocate:   New Content

I don't disagree with you in the least in regards to the severity of the US actions. The purpose of my Article was to make people morr aware ofnthe process of how the government manufactures public consent. They create false narratives and they pressure people to capitulate to the use of their language and thereby their agenda.


The manipulation of language is becoming a greater part of state propaganda because it doesn't create any immediate ethical confrontation, like racist posters producted in the past. The subtle introduction of phrases which gently steer people towards a given narrative slowly reel in the prey and before you know it they are spewing talking points of one team or the other.


Most Amerocans would object to the US actions IF THEY UNDERSTOOD the truth of the situation. But they are being brainwashed. They only way to stop indoctrination is to make people aware of what is being done to them.


Thanks for your comments.

Submitted on Friday, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:03:09 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Devil's Advocate

Become a Fan
Author 500650

(Member since Nov 9, 2014), 9 fans, 2410 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Michele Goddard:   New Content

I know. "Bringing Democracy" sounds far more benevolent than "Bombing the s**t out of them". We're obviously on the same page.

The narratives are so completely distorted that the truth is barely discernible, and the media isn't there to correct this, but rather to accelerate the effect. :(

Submitted on Friday, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:03:26 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

Michele Goddard

Become a Fan
Author 513220

(Member since Mar 28, 2019), 2 articles, 12 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Devil's Advocate:   New Content

So true. Looking across the spectrum of hreats to our existence there enemies being created for us by the media, the diving of the populace into segments so we will fight each other is all a grand illusions meant to dostrclact us from the "great threat". Not to saw that white supremecists or religious extremists aren't a real threat because obviouspy they are. But these groups are being fomented by those who want to miadirect our effots. We have to begin to triage our populace. We have to see which groups are willing to pay aside their differences to work as a collective and which ones aren't. But we have to try and build a majority. And we have to stop having the same knee jerk reactions or we will never stay on course. We can't demonize those who may be merely misled. We have to talk more to see if we can find common ground. Of course there will be some that we can't or shouldn't ally with but if there were really that many people on the fringes the media wouldn't be so invested in trying to push those in the middle more to the extremes. Thanks again for the dialogue. Take care.


Submitted on Friday, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:48:43 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment