Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Winning The Peace: The Post-Shutdown Challenge

By       Message Richard Eskow     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to None 10/18/13

Author 77715
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

It's a major victory. The shutdown's ending, the government isn't defaulting (at least not yet), and Democrats didn't yield in the face of threats and bullying. But what happens next could shape our fate for many years to come.

- Advertisement -

Congratulations are in order. The President vowed not to negotiate over the debt ceiling, and he was as good as his word. He stood up to the closet ideologues of the artificial "center," the ones who unwisely argued that being the "adult in the room" meant surrendering to the tantrums of children.

Sen. Harry Reid's tough talk was matched by equally tough action. (Reid also deserves credit for coining the phrase "banana Republicans," as pithy a summation of their approach to governance as we've seen.)

Once and Future Losses

But the celebrations are premature. Yes, the public is furious at Republicans -- Tea Partiers and plain-vanilla GOP extremists alike -- for causing so much damage in pursuit of an ideology so far outside the political mainstream. Most Americans have rejected the things Republicans stand for: their values, their priorities, and their apocalyptic economic vision.

- Advertisement -

And yet, unless something changes, this deal will bend the next few months' deliberations along the same misguided lines that have guided our political discourse for years now. House and Senate members will be encouraged to come up with a "deficit reduction plan" -- in other words, to impose another round of cuts just like those which have already wounded the economy and shredded millions of jobs.

That's hardly cause for celebration. The conservative Peter G Peterson Foundation estimates that the "crisis driven fiscal policy" of the past several years has resulted in the loss of 900,000 jobs. Discretionary cuts of the kind that will be urged upon Congress have already cost us 1.2 million jobs, according to the study, and have resulted in a loss of 0.7% from the GDP.

Remember, these estimates are on the conservative end.

This pointless and futile round of threats has cost the economy significant losses in both consumer confidence and business investment. That's not just our conclusion. It's also what a visiting panel from Wall Street told the House Financial Services Committee earlier this week. The shutdown has cost our economy $24 billion and lowered the GDP by 0.6%, according to an analysis by Standard & Poor's.

As we've said before: we can't afford Republicans anymore.

Tax Break

Yes, there will be talk about "increasing tax revenue." But it won't focus on raising the top tax rates for millionaires and billionaires, even though the generally conservative International Monetary Fund recently proposed raising top tax rates to pre-Reagan levels. In this country, that would mean nearly doubling the top tax rate from its current 39.5 percent to 73 or 74 percent.

- Advertisement -

(We discussed this topic on the Thom Hartmann show yesterday. The video is here.)

Lawmakers are more likely to discuss limiting tax deductions and exclusions -- "tax expenditures," in Beltway parlance. And the "expenditures" they're likely to target are likely to target include the deductions that are currently keeping the struggling middle class afloat, like health expenses, mortgage interest, and child care tax credits.

There will also be talk of "tax reform," but it will most likely focus on tax code tinkering designed to lock in today's historically -- and unfairly -- low rates of taxation for corporations and very high earning individuals. That's not "reform": it's a payoff to big campaign contributors.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz