But here is the looming question about Abramoff: Has he cooperated with federal officials in such a way that the full tale of Bush-era corruption will be revealed?
If Abramoff indeed "spilled the groceries" to federal officials, some prominent political figures with ties to the South might have reason to be extremely nervous.
Reports the Associated Press:
As part of his plea deal, Abramoff cooperated in a long-running Justice Department investigation that led to the convictions of former Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, former Deputy Interior Secretary J. Steven Griles and several top Capitol Hill aides.
But how far did Abramoff's cooperation go? What about political figures who go way beyond Bob Ney and J. Steven Griles?
Southern politicos with reported ties to Abramoff (and his fellow felon Michael Scanlon) include Alabama Governor Bob Riley, Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, former Texas Congressman Tom DeLay, and (of course) former Bush White House strategist Karl Rove.
Perhaps no one has stronger ties to Abramoff and Scanlon than Alabama's Bob Riley. Bill Johnson, a former member of Riley's cabinet, says Abramoff should be called to testify in an ongoing federal investigation of gambling-related matters in Alabama.
Is the story of "Casino Jack" Abramoff about to wind down? Or is it just starting to heat up?
National Public Radio (NPR), in a recent review of the Casino Jack film, provides an encouraging hint. It comes when NPR discusses director Alex Gibney's approach to the subject and compares his work to that of Michael Moore:
What Gibney does share with Moore is an unapologetically leftist ideological streak. Knowing that, his ability to get interviews with prominent conservatives is impressive. Former Texas Congressman Tom DeLay, in particular, sits down for an extensive Q&A with Gibney in which he proves remarkably candid--and shockingly unrepentant--about his alignment with Abramoff.
Unfortunately, the one on-camera interview Gibney doesn't score is with Abramoff himself. The director spoke to his subject a number of times while researching the film, but Abramoff--a federal prisoner, and involved in ongoing investigations to boot--wasn't allowed to appear on camera. While the film contains a great deal of archival footage of Abramoff, from childhood through to his conviction, along with mountains of e-mail correspondence in which he gloats with associates over his schemes, the lack of Abramoff's current perspective is an unfortunate omission.
So as of May 6, 2010, the date of the review, Abramoff was involved in ongoing investigations? Does that mean some prominent Republican sphincters might be getting tight?
Let's hope so.