Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H3'ed 10/4/10

Why the GOP Pledge to America Bombed

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 48152
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jimmy Zuma
Become a Fan

The Party of No puts it in writing -- and no one really cares"

In 1994, the Contract with America sealed the deal. For months, Republicans had been demonizing Bill Clinton and the Democratic Congress. Newt Gingrich disparaged Clinton daily for a "socialist" agenda, philandering, and insider capitalism. Gingrich was having his own affair and would soon leave in disgrace. But in '94, the Contract was the knockout punch for a Republican takeover of the House of Representatives.

Given electoral success in the '94 midterms, it only made sense to try a repeat. But the Pledge to America landed like a load of elephant dung at the circus, barely capturing one news cycle before being shoveled up and binned. What went wrong? Here's the prevailing analysis:

That's a lot of filler in there, big fella

The 45 page document is full of white space and big color photographs of mountains and monuments. It has three title pages, a two-page "pledge" that says almost nothing, a six-page forward that rehashes old Republican talking points, and thirty more pages. About half the remaining pages contain photos of Republican House Members, no fewer than 44 in all. It even has a two-page back cover. Taken at a glance, it looks like one of those planned-community brochures that real estate developers create so you won't notice they knocked down all the trees; there's lots of shiny, not much shade.

It's simply The Party of No" on paper

In many ways, the Pledge is a written version of what we've already heard. Republicans promise: to stop healthcare, stop regulation of business, stop collecting taxes, stop old people from retiring, and stop any attempt to stop favoring the rich.

The document envisions a government that does nothing for citizens, does anything for corporations, and protects the Department of Defense as the primary instrument for corporate welfare. But none of this is new. These ideas have dominated Fox News (and enjoyed substantial airing at other news outlets) for two years now.

Consider this sentence,

"With common-sense exceptions for seniors, veterans, and our troops, we will roll back government spending to pre-stimulus, prebailout levels, saving us at least $100 billion in the first year alone and putting us on a path to balance the budget and pay down the debt."

While claiming to protect seniors (they vote) and soldiers (they provide cover for corporate welfare), what they've really done here is pretend that one-time stimulus was actually an annual expense, then claim to save about seven percent of the annual deficit. This is simply a combination of a political trick and an accounting trick. Even if it were real, cutting the deficit seven percent annually would lead to the first balanced budget in fourteen years, 2024. Seven House terms, that's a mighty long "path."

The Pledge is insubstantial

Republicans propose to "freeze government spending" and eliminate "waste and fraud." They also promise to protect the borders and enforce sanctions on Iran. Of course, all of these ideas are both bi-partisan and as fluffy as a well-made souffle'. Then, we enjoy two pages with photographs of Republican House Members!

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Jimmy Zuma Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jimmy Zuma writes the online political journal Smart v. Stupid. He also writes a weekly column for the Tucson Sentinel under the same title, and a weekly feature, DC Water Cooler, for Technorati. His beat is national politics.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

SB1070 -- The Joe Arpaio Racial Profiling Protection Act

Goldman Sachs: Guilty of NY Felony Gambling Law?

Why the GOP Pledge to America Bombed

Whitman High Bids for California Governor

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: