Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 22 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 8/23/19

Why is the New York Times still trying to sweep the Epstein case under the rug?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   7 comments
Author 35991
Message Patrick Martin

From WSWS

Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Inside Edition)
  Details   DMCA

A prominent article published in the Washington Post Thursday exposes the systematic violation of prison rules governing the detention of multimillionaire sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein during the period immediately preceding his death on August 10.

Reporter Devlin Barrett writes: "At least eight Bureau of Prisons staffers knew that strict instructions had been given not to leave multimillionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein alone in his cell, yet the order was apparently ignored in the 24 hours leading up to his death, according to people familiar with the matter."

His report continues: "The fact that so many prison officials were aware of the directive -- not just low-level correctional officers, but supervisors and managers -- has alarmed investigators assessing what so far appears to be a stunning failure to follow instructions, these people said."

This language is quite extraordinary, suggesting that Post reporters have reason to believe that the security failure has no legitimate explanation, and may have been the result of concerted action to leave Epstein exposed and vulnerable.

The report continues, "Investigators suspect that at least some of these individuals also knew Epstein had been left alone in a cell before he died, and they are working to determine the extent of such knowledge ..."

In other words, numerous prison officials, including some in authority, were aware that Epstein -- on suicide watch from July 23 to July 29 -- was alone in a cell, in violation of rules governing at-risk prisoners. (Other press accounts claim that his cellmate was granted bail on Friday, August 9, and released from custody, leaving Epstein by himself.)

Epstein was found dead in his cell the following morning, at 6:30 a.m. on Saturday, August 10. During that night, the two guards assigned to check in on him every 30 minutes did not do so. Both were said to have been asleep for some or all of that night, rather than standing watch.

The two guards reportedly falsified the logs to show that they had checked on Epstein as required, but these logs were contradicted by video evidence from a surveillance camera monitoring the hallway outside his cell.

Investigators from the FBI and the inspector-general of the Department of Justice have taken possession of the videotapes, but have released no information about what they show, including whether there were any unauthorized visitors to Epstein's cell the night he died.

The Post report suggests misconduct on a scale so staggering that it leaves little doubt that Epstein was either murdered or allowed to commit suicide, with the former far more likely. It defies belief that so many Bureau of Prisons employees, including managers and supervisors, could have each independently decided to ignore the rules for handling the most notorious prisoner then in federal custody.

Epstein had been arrested July 6 at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey, and was being held on sex-trafficking charges that carried a possible sentence of 45 years in prison. The nature of the charges, combined with his vast wealth and his connections in high places -- including to Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew of England, and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman -- ensured maximum television and tabloid publicity for the case.

Many powerful people feared exposure if Epstein were brought to trial, and there is ample evidence that he was preparing an aggressive and highly publicized defense rather than attempting a plea bargain that would have swept the case under the rug. Epstein was meeting with his lawyers for as many as 12 hours a day, and they have described his demeanor as anything but downcast or suicidal. (Epstein denied that he had attempted suicide July 23, claiming he was the victim of an assault by a cellmate).

Under these circumstances, the real question is why the bulk of the American media, spearheaded by the New York Times, has chosen to swallow the claim of "suicide" and denounced any questioning of the official verdict as a "conspiracy theory." Epstein was killed in downtown Manhattan, only a few miles from Times Square. But most of the reports exposing new evidence in the case have come in the pages of the Washington Post, while the Times has published lengthy reports -- such as a front-page account in its edition of Sunday, August 19 -- which could be summed up as "nothing to see here, move along please."

It is worth recalling that when Epstein was first arrested, the Times editorialized against making a political issue out of his kid-glove treatment during his first sex-crimes prosecution in 2008. The editorial urged congressional Democrats to stay away from Epstein, although the US Attorney who had recommended a token 13-month sentence in 2008 -- with six days out of seven on work-release to run his financial empire -- was Alex Acosta, chosen by Trump as his secretary of labor.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Valuable 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Patrick Martin Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Patrick Martin writes for the World Socialist Website (wsws.org), a forum for socialist ideas & analysis & published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI).
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Low-wage, No-raise Economy

Mounting political crisis in Washington amidst talk of removal of Trump

US House of Representatives votes to abolish Medicare

Nearly One Million US Workers Cut Off Unemployment Benefits

Obama hails deal to impose record cuts in social spending

US House of Representatives approves plan to destroy Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

6 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments


Harold Novikoff

Become a Fan
Author 92139

(Member since Feb 8, 2014), 1 fan, 77 articles, 94 comments, 5 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

What I am curious to know about the Epstein affair, and what the American people are entitled to know, is whether Trump - his once good friend - is among the list of clients in the documents seized in the raid on Epstein's home and, if so, what was the nature of that relationship. And will that information be suppressed?

Submitted on Friday, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:50:19 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Janet Supriano

Become a Fan
Author 90270

(Member since Oct 7, 2013), 12 fans, 1923 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Harold Novikoff:   New Content

IMHO, the list is endless of facts the U.S. people are entitled to know.

To your final question, YES.

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:23:54 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 

Charles Homer

Become a Fan
Author 511996

(Member since Aug 27, 2018), 1 fan, 139 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Here is a video showing the raid on Epstein's Little St. James Island home:

click here

Apparently, the "watchers" don't like to be watched.

Submitted on Friday, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:53:25 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784

(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 39 fans, 1 articles, 14 quicklinks, 5251 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

The establishment press has crossed the Rubicon into total illegitimacy with the handling of this story. Hardly anyone regardless of political affiliation believes the official narrative. The charge of conspiracy theorist hurled at the nonbelievers carries no weight. It's become a joke.


The hubris of the privileged class is at the point of undermining their authority. Even if we don't ever get the whole truth about this sordid tale, these creeps have been outed. When there is no longer any trust in the system, the system is doomed to fall.

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:01:05 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (6+)
Help
 

Janet Supriano

Become a Fan
Author 90270

(Member since Oct 7, 2013), 12 fans, 1923 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

To anyone who hasn't read it, I recommend Ed Curtin's superb piece on the Epstein 'mystery.' (below on this page)

The sooner we let go of this baloney, the less pleasure the creeps get from our made-to-order confusion. Screw 'em!


https://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Pseudo-Debate-Over-Jef-by-Edward-Curtin-CIA_Death_Jeffrey-Epstein_Murder-190821-49.html

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:21:11 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Daniel Geery

Become a Fan
Author 1198

(Member since Jul 9, 2009), 69 fans, 367 articles, 3572 quicklinks, 16619 comments, 180 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Janet Supriano:   New Content

Here's another, from Graham Elwood, aka The Political Vigilante click here. I greatly appreciate his welcoming Whitney Webb to his show, and submit that she offers the best "overall analysis" I've come across. The Epstein Show is nothing new in the grander perspective.

P.S. I found it interesting that a Clinton appointed Federal Judge recently offered strong vindication for Julian Assange. Most glad to hear that (also found on Graham's channel), even though it is not likely to mean much based on what I hear from John Pilger and knowing too much about our corrupt government. However, I also note that distraction is one of the Clintons' many modus operandis, when the heat is on. Quien sabe and cui bono?

Submitted on Saturday, Aug 24, 2019 at 6:10:00 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (4+)
Help
 

Davey Jones

Become a Fan
Author 19475

(Member since Jul 29, 2008), 6 fans, 493 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Convenient how the mass shootings and antifa/proud boys riots in Portland all come together right at the same time as the Epstien child trafficking / blackmailing ring is exposed. Epstien AND his co conspirators all have a convenient cover to bury the story under. Makes me wonder who else in the corporate controlled media is also tied in with the whole crime network All of them. Even in the supposed 'left' media

Submitted on Sunday, Aug 25, 2019 at 4:34:41 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment