Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   7 comments
General News

Why in Oregon, Washington, and California (but not Texas or New York) did poorer counties vote for Romney?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Don Smith     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/20/14

Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -

In High poverty counties tend to vote Republican in Washington State, I observed that Washington State counties with a higher percentage of people living below the poverty line tend to vote for Romney. In this article, I extend my analysis to other states.

The following scatter graph shows, for counties with population greater than 10,000, how the conservativeness of the county relates to the poverty rate. It shows that in Washington State, high poverty counties tended to vote for Romney.

to be more conservative.

Poverty is defined as the percentage of residents living below the poverty line, according to the 2010 US census. Conservativeness is defined as the proportion of voters who voted for Romney (versus Obama) in 2012. Source of data: US census and 2012 election results from The Guardian.

- Advertisement -
Here's a similar graph for Oregon. It too shows that in Oregon poorer counties tended to vote for Romney.

The graph for California is similar: wealthy counties (near Silicon Valley?) tended to vote for Obama. But there are few or no poorer counties that voted for Romney.

- Advertisement -

But for Texas it's different: poorer counties in Texas tended to vote for Obama. (The effect is pronounced.)


For New York too, poorer counties in New York tended to vote for Obama (though the effect is small).


Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, and North Carolina are similar to New York and Texas: high poverty counties tended to vote for Obama. In PA Philadelphia stands out as a high poverty city; in Philly 85% of votes went to Obama.

- Advertisement -

Nationwide, there's a small relation between conservativeness and poverty: there's a cluster of some high-poverty, Obama-voting counties on the upper left of the following scatter plot graph, as well as a smaller cluster of high-poverty, Romney-voting counties on the upper-right.


So, my question is: why in Oregon, Washington, and California -- but not in Texas or New York -- do poorer counties tend to vote Republican?


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The myth that the Dems are as bad as the Repugs

Why Abortion Isn't Murder

Image essay about blood soaked NRA

Government is like a computer's operating system: a response to libertarians

Failure to prosecute: why Obama is having trouble passing health care reform

Undividing the Left: Hard-core and Soft-core progressives