Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Scotland Must Vote Yes

By       Message        (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   2 comments

Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 9/17/14

Author 85821

(Image by Yes Scotland)   Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
br />

I am not a nationalist, and never have been. I have always loathed nationalism. I favor open borders. But I hope with all my heart that Scotland votes for independence tomorrow.

A vote for independence is not a vote for the Scottish National Party, or for nationalism, but for a democratic Scotland. While the S.N.P. has moved from being the "Tartan Tory" party it used to be, it's still not my party, and I've disliked Alex Salmond for at least 25 years...

But none of that matters. Because, if the S.N.P. doesn't keep its promises in an independent Scotland, the voters will kick it out at the first election.

- Advertisement -

Salmond isn't stupid. He knows this.

He knows that in order to remain in government in an independent Scotland, his party has to deliver everything listed in the image above.

And there's no reason why it can't.

- Advertisement -

In fact (and I do mean fact), while there are many reasons to vote for independence, there is not a single reason to vote to stay part of the far-from-United Kingdom. The Better Together faction has had to resort to wild economic scaremongering, because it has nothing else to offer. Bizarrely, England is now offering Scotland more power than it had before if it votes No. So, if we vote No, our masters will kindly give us less power than we'll have if we free ourselves from them by voting Yes?

Such an offer is unsurprising. We're used to them treating us like idiots.

If we were "better together," we wouldn't be having this referendum. Whatever the challenges faced by an independent Scotland (and of course there will be many, most of them unknown to us at this point), it will be better than the best we can hope for if we continue under English rule, as subjects, not citizens.

There's a reason England is desperately pressuring Scotland not to split. But Scotland doesn't need England. Scotland doesn't need the National Health Service and education to be privatized. Scotland doesn't need to be a warehouse for American nuclear weapons.

Scotland has had centuries under English rule, and has been robbed, lied to and abused all along, "bought and sold for English gold" as Burns had it. For the 29 years I lived there, Scotland had no future, and little tangible past, only an oppressive present.

The future can begin now.

- Advertisement -

(Article changed on September 17, 2014 at 09:53)


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Media Helped Keep Debra Milke on Death Row for 20 Years

Why Scotland Must Vote Yes

Why I Watch People Die

Racism and Classism in the Argument for Fluoridation in Portland's Water

Bernie Sanders Sells His Soul and Ensures a Trump Victory

Why Obama Can't Destroy Hope Or Prevent Change