Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 9/17/14

Why Scotland Must Vote Yes

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 85821
Message


(Image by Yes Scotland)   Details   DMCA

I am not a nationalist, and never have been. I have always loathed nationalism. I favor open borders. But I hope with all my heart that Scotland votes for independence tomorrow.

A vote for independence is not a vote for the Scottish National Party, or for nationalism, but for a democratic Scotland. While the S.N.P. has moved from being the "Tartan Tory" party it used to be, it's still not my party, and I've disliked Alex Salmond for at least 25 years...

But none of that matters. Because, if the S.N.P. doesn't keep its promises in an independent Scotland, the voters will kick it out at the first election.

Salmond isn't stupid. He knows this.

He knows that in order to remain in government in an independent Scotland, his party has to deliver everything listed in the image above.

And there's no reason why it can't.

In fact (and I do mean fact), while there are many reasons to vote for independence, there is not a single reason to vote to stay part of the far-from-United Kingdom. The Better Together faction has had to resort to wild economic scaremongering, because it has nothing else to offer. Bizarrely, England is now offering Scotland more power than it had before if it votes No. So, if we vote No, our masters will kindly give us less power than we'll have if we free ourselves from them by voting Yes?

Such an offer is unsurprising. We're used to them treating us like idiots.

If we were "better together," we wouldn't be having this referendum. Whatever the challenges faced by an independent Scotland (and of course there will be many, most of them unknown to us at this point), it will be better than the best we can hope for if we continue under English rule, as subjects, not citizens.

There's a reason England is desperately pressuring Scotland not to split. But Scotland doesn't need England. Scotland doesn't need the National Health Service and education to be privatized. Scotland doesn't need to be a warehouse for American nuclear weapons.

Scotland has had centuries under English rule, and has been robbed, lied to and abused all along, "bought and sold for English gold" as Burns had it. For the 29 years I lived there, Scotland had no future, and little tangible past, only an oppressive present.

The future can begin now.

(Article changed on September 17, 2014 at 09:53)

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Media Helped Keep Debra Milke on Death Row for 20 Years

Why Scotland Must Vote Yes

Why I Watch People Die

Racism and Classism in the Argument for Fluoridation in Portland's Water

Bernie Sanders Sells His Soul and Ensures a Trump Victory

Why Obama Can't Destroy Hope Or Prevent Change

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: