Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Why Michele Bachmann?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   3 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Mary Wentworth
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Why Michele Bachmann?


A few weeks ago I watched a half-hour of a televised debate among GOP candidates who had gathered in New Hampshire for the occasion. As I was switching channels, I thought Michele Bachmann had won it hands down.


Why? For starters, Bachmann not only connected with the people in the hall, but also, I believe, those watching on TV. She interacted with her audience, coming across in a warm, direct, personable manner. A boat her male rivals completely missed.


She has remained unflappable in her media interviews and displayed composure when attacked by former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty at the Iowa debate last week. Unlike her counterparts, she doesn't appear to come onto the field all armored up to do battle in spite of the notion that her husband, or perhaps even God, had called on her to run for president.


It's hard to see Michele ever putting on a black leather jacket a la you-know-who. M.B. dresses in an understated style that says she doesn't want to compete with the "macho" in male culture or appear to be "tough." Like Dubya did.


So... it's not the economy, stupid. It's the image. Here in my home state of Massachusetts, we are painfully aware of what counts with many voters. In the special election mood of 2010, the electorate in choosing a replacement for Senator Ted Kennedy went for a non-political type: someone who wore a barn coat, drove a pick-up, did a Playboy spread, and didn't boilerplate them to death.


Now, as someone on this site has pointed out, we have the task of showing what a "dim bulb" Scott Brown really is in order to get back to sanity.


We Democrats have been lectured about our pigheadedness in thinking that patiently explaining our stands on the issues will grab people in the emotional parts of their brains that dictate how they vote. Remember "Reagan had such a nice smile" and "George is a guy I could drink a beer with." Neither "smile" nor "beer" has anything to do with governing a country. Some say we should have learned way back when Adlai Stevenson got dubbed an "egghead." Mostly by the media, of course. Who needs brains to run America anyway.


Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Mary Wentworth Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Now retired and a writer, I am a feminist and political activist, a radical Democrat (have come to dislike the term "progressive"), and a blogger. Have done political tours of Cuba, Nicaragua, Honduras, West and East (way back when)Germany, (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"We Can't Find Mary Jo" - Kennedy at Chappaquiddick

Elizabeth Warren: Can She Beat Scott Brown?

A Plea To The Occupy Movement

"War Is A Racket" by Marine Major General Smedley Butler


US as World-Class Bully

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend