Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Isn't Wall Street in Jail? -- a synopsis of Matt Taibbi's recent article and interview

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Clark       (Page 1 of 9 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   14 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Valuable 5   Well Said 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 2/26/11

Author 8235
Become a Fan
  (110 fans)
- Advertisement -

This report is based mostly on an interview that Amy Goodman recently did with Matt Taibbi.

 

"Nobody goes to jail," writes Matt Taibbi in the new issue of Rolling Stone magazine.   This is the lament of the financial-crisis era, "one that saw virtually every major bank and financial company on Wall Street embroiled in obscene criminal scandals that impoverished millions and collectively destroyed trillions of dollars of the world's wealth."   In his new article, Taibbi also explains how the American people have been defrauded by Wall Street investors and how the financial crisis is connected to the current situations in states like Wisconsin and Ohio, especially with regard to worker pensions there.

 

- Advertisement -

By way of introduction to Matt's article, here are two sentences from a recent paper by economist Dean Baker, who concludes, "Most of the pension shortfall is attributable to the plunge in the stock market in the years 2007-2009.   Keep in mind that if pension funds had earned returns just equal to the interest rate on 30-year Treasury bonds in the three years since 2007, their assets would be more than $850 billion greater than they are today."

 

Consider also this quote from David Cay Johnston of tax.com:   "The average Wisconsin pension is $24,500 a year, which is hardly lavish.   But what is stunning is that 15% of the money contributed to the pension fund each year is being funneled to Wall Street in fees," which is one reason why Matt keeps repeating the mantra, "Why isn't Wall Street in jail?"

- Advertisement -

 

"So, why isn't Wall Street in jail, Matt?"   So asked Amy Goodman in her recent interview with Taibbi.   Amy continued, "We're seeing these mass protests in Madison, Wisconsin, and elsewhere.   We see the working poor, the middle class, under tremendous stress all over the United States, and yet they're the ones who are being hit hardest, not Wall Street.   Explain what happened."  

 

Matt begins his reply by explaining that Governor Kasich was an employee for Lehman Brothers and was intimately involved with getting the state of Ohio's pension fund to invest in Lehman Brothers and buy mortgage-backed securities.   And of course Lehman Brothers lost all that money.   This, broadly, was really what the mortgage bubble and the financial crisis was all about:   It was essentially a gigantic criminal fraud scheme where all the banks were taking mismarked mortgage-backed securities, made up of very, very dangerous, toxic subprime loans.   The banks were in a sense chopping them up, reassembling them, and then packaging them as AAA-rated investment vehicles, then selling these rat-trap vehicles to state pension funds, to insurance companies, to Chinese banks and Dutch banks and Icelandic banks.   And, of course, these things, these vehicles, started blowing up, as rat-trap vehicles are apt to do, and all those pension funds then proceeded to go broke.   But what Kasich and other Republican governors are doing now is blaming the people who were collecting these pensions--they're blaming the workers, they're blaming the firemen, they're blaming the policemen--whereas, in reality, these workers were actually the victims of this fraud scheme, and certainly not the people responsible for planning the scheme or executing the scam that followed!   And the only reason that people aren't angrier about this, is that most of them don't yet fully understand what happened.   If these were car companies that had sold a trillion dollars' worth of profoundly defective cars to the citizens of the United States, and refused to recall them and fix those cars, there would be riots right now.   But these were mortgage-backed securities;   it's complicated;   most people don't understand it, and they're only now beginning to realize that they've been defrauded.

 

It is somewhat difficult to fully grasp, so let's go over it again.   Explain again, in more detail, what the crime is.   Who has profited?   Who should be on trial and why?

- Advertisement -

 

The crime in all of this was simple fraud.   These banks had these billion-dollar pools of mortgages where, in some cases, 70 or 80% of the loans behind these mortgages were to people who had no proper qualifications for them.   Their credit score stunk, they had no decent job and sometimes no job at all, and/or they had no money to put down on the mortgage.   And then the banks were taking loans like this, mixing them with others, applying some hocus-pocus and turning the assembled packages into "AAA-rated investment vehicles."   Then they marketed these securities to, say, state pension funds, fraudulently portraying these securities as genuinely AAA-rated investments, which means that the credit risk on them was claimed to be almost zero.   In other words, they took mortgages that they knew were very, very risky and very, very likely to default, and they were going to the state of Wisconsin, the state of Ohio, the state of New York (among many other places), and saying, "Hey, this investment is as safe as United States Treasury bonds.   You should buy this, and you'll earn a little bit more than you'll earn if you buy T-bills."   The reality was, however, that they were just taking absolutely worthless stuff and "sticking it" to these investors, and then going back to their offices and essentially placing bets on how soon the junk they just sold would default!   This is no different than a used car dealer who makes superficial repairs to an internally damaged car, rolls back the odometer, and sells it to you as a great car, with not many miles on it, that's practically new and runs good.   It's a clear case of fraud in both cases.   And if, on top of that, the used car dealer were to somehow take out an insurance policy on the rolling death trap he just sold you, that would be analogous to what the banksters did when they purchased insurance on these other vehicles (mortgage-backed security vehicles of investment), from companies like AIG.   (More on this momentarily).

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Valuable 5   Well Said 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Richard Clark Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?