Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why Do Conservatives Soak Up Lies?

By       Message Eric Zuesse     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 3   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/10/14

Author 85251
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on March 10, 2014 at 15:54)

(Article changed on March 10, 2014 at 15:13)

- Advertisement -

The evidence that conservatives crave lies is abundant.

Conservatives loved George W. Bush's and Dick Cheney's lies about "Saddam's weapons of mass destruction" -- loved them so much, that the researchers who wrote "'There Must Be a Reason': Osama, Saddam, and Inferred Justification" surveyed 49 conservative Republicans, during October 2004, who admitted that they still believed Saddam Hussein had caused the 9/11 (2001) attacks, and these researchers found that 48 of those 49 extreme conservatives were entirely impervious to the overwhelming factual evidence that was provided to them by the presenters contradicting this false belief they held. Then, a separate study showed that when Republicans were offered the official 2004 Duelfer report that had concluded Iraq hadn't possessed any weapons of mass destruction for years before the United States invaded it in 2003, the percentage of Republicans who believed that Iraq did have WMD immediately prior to the invasion shot up, instead of going down (as, of course, would have happened if these people had been rational). Even all of the exposés that had already been published about Bush's faked WMD "proofs" didn't persuade Republican voters that they'd simply been deceived by the people they trusted and supported. They didn't resent it at all; they just asked for more, from those same discredited liars.

Conservatives also loved Sarah Palin's and Chuck Grassley's lies about "Obama's death panels" -- loved these lies so much, that "politically knowledgeable Palin supporters" actually increased their belief in the death panels, after being provided proof that it was a lie.

These believers in death panels were sometimes called "deathers." But there was also a "birther" lie, from Rupert Murdoch and others,which was popular among conservatives. On 15 February 2011, Public Policy Polling released their survey of likely Republican U.S. Presidential Primary voters for 2012. Headlining, "Huckabee Tops GOP Field; 51% Are Birthers," this report about lie-lovers said that, "A 51% majority of national GOP primary voters think President Obama was not born in the U.S. 28% know that he was." Murdoch's Fox "News" and talk-radio had nourished fantasy, and this was one result of that feeding-of-lies. But Murdoch's own The Australian, on the opposite side of the planet (which was safely distant from Murdoch's propaganda-factory inside the U.S.), headlined about this poll, "Republicans Refuse to Accept Barack Obama Was Born in US," and stated forthrightly something that Murdoch's minions in the U.S. never would or could: "Crazy is a word being used increasingly to describe a large and growing proportion of American conservatives who refuse to believe that President Obama was born in the United States." Those "crazy" people were Murdoch's own U.S. audience -- an audience of lie-lovers.

- Advertisement -

On November 22nd of 2011, thinkprogress.org headlined "Fox News Viewers Are the Most Misinformed: A Seventh Study Arrives to Prove It," and Chris Mooney linked to each of the 7 different studies that had been done of this subject, all of which found the same thing.

Conservatives also love the lie from the Koch brothers, Murdoch, and others, that global warming isn't happening and that it isn't being caused by human releases of carbon gases into the atmosphere, even though 97+% of the world's climatologists  say  that it is happening, and that it is being caused by human generation of carbon gases.

So: why do conservatives sop up lies, on topic after topic?

They do it because, if they didn't, they couldn't be themselves; they couldn't be conservatives. Lie-lovers is whom they are. It's their identity.

Fool them once, and once is not enough; they demand more lies. It's like heroin to them. They're addicts.

They can't get enough lies. They are addicted to being deceived. They need to believe conservatism and conservatives.

The Republican Party relies upon voters who are addicted to lies. So, conservatism is a drug, which will also have its pushers. And pushers serve suckers. It's a huge market -- the market for lies. And a huge business, serving them.

- Advertisement -

And that's why conservatives sop up lies: it's because they're conservatives. That's what a conservative is:  someone addicted to lies.

A stunning article by Ron Suskind, in the New York Times Magazine, on 17 October 2004, headlined about Bush, "Without a Doubt: Faith, Certainty, and the Presidency of George W.Bush," and described the heedless confidence, the total lack of doubt, in a White House permeated by faith, and demanding compliance to it. Rejecting science was a matter of personal pride for them. Suskind reported how the Bush inner circle described this White House to him (mostly not for attribution).

One "senior adviser to Bush" explained the situation with remarkable frankness. Suskind wrote: "Guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernable reality.' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. 'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' he continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors; and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'"

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Funny 3   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

First Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down

Indications that the U.S. Is Planning a Nuclear Attack Against Russia

Harry Reid Effectively Kills Obama's TPP and TTIP International Trade Deals

MH-17 'Investigation': Secret August 8th Agreement Seeps Out

The Propaganda War About Ukraine: How Important It Really Is

UPDATED -- Conclusive: 2 Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down that Malaysian Airliner.