Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/16/12

Why Bain Won't be Romney's Bain

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message earl ofari hutchinson
Become a Fan
  (10 fans)


GOP presidential contenders Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich, GOP strategist Karl Rove, and a few other GOP stalwarts loudly claim that the Bain issue is a potential presidential game loser for presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. The story has been well-worked over. Romney supposedly cut, slashed and burned a rash of private companies during his years as an investor and operative for the private equity firm, Bain & Company. There's absolutely no way the conventional wisdom goes that Romney can claim that he can do what President Obama allegedly has failed to do and that's be a job creator. In a head to head general election dual with Romney, Obama will repeatedly loop the Bain ad attacks from Perry and Gingrich on Romney about Bain and this will sink his campaign faster than the Hindenburg.

Yet what appears to be a loser of an issue for Romney could just as likely be a potential winner. He's got a big trump card when it comes to venture capitalism that even President Obama is well aware of. And that's the engrained attitudes of many American's toward free enterprise. A lot of Americans, including many of those that rail at the greed of Wall Street and corporations, dream of striking it rich, and that means owning their own business.

Polls continually show that a majority of Americans fervently believe that the poor aren't poor because the capitalist system is greedy, corrupt and exploitive. They blame their poverty on their personal failings. When poverty started to inch up in 2001, National Public Radio (NPR), the Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard University's Kennedy School found that respondents no matter their background was routinely said that the poor were "unmotivated," "lacked aspirations to get ahead," and "didn't work hard enough." That included a significant percent of the poor. The overwhelming consensus was that with hard work and determination anyone could succeed. A second consistent finding is that Americans just as fervently believe that free enterprise system and free markets is far and away the best, if not only, system in the world to generate, growth, prosperity, and jobs. The collapse of Communism, the fiscal woes and convulsions of European social democratic governments, and the massive GOP sell job that ballooning government spending and mounting deficits has retarded economic growth, is proof positive for a majority of Americans that free enterprise, unchecked and unbridled is the engine for job growth and individual wealth building. A Gallup poll in 2010, found that nearly 90 percent of Americans gave a positive rating to free enterprise. Though there were sharp divisions about the merits of small versus big business, with near universal approval for small business, few said that big business was the enemy of economic growth.

Romney's push back is that Bain was not an evil ogre and that he was not a greedy corporate rip-off artist at the expense of workers and that small to medium sized businesses would not have a prayer of getting off the ground if venture firms didn't supply the cash. This sounds even more compelling considering the virtual freeze by the big banks on lending to small, start up, or debt ridden firms. Even Obama has at times sounded like a fervent free marketer in touting private business as the key to growth in countless speeches and appearances.  

Romney's contention that he created 100,000 jobs through his Bain actions is unverifiable at best and hogwash at worst. But his point that a range of enterprises such as pension funds, charities, and university endowments, have put money into venture funds and made money to fund programs and endowments is true. His other point that many of the businesses that Bain and other private equity firms dump cash into were failing any way is also true.

Romney has tried to turn the table on Obama and paint him as a venture capitalist citing the Solyndra flap.   This is the shaky Fremont, California company that got over a half billion in government dollars to manufacture cylindrical solar panels. There's more.   By the end of 2011, the White House also plans to channel more than $50 billion through tax credits, low-interest guaranteed loans and grants to green energy ventures. These ventures may well be just as risky, unproven, and with no guarantee of success in creating jobs or doing much to achieve energy independence.   The big difference though is that the Obama administration is not dumping government money into these ventures to make a fat profit for individual investors and speculators but to implement the government's energy independence policy.

This crucial distinction between Obama's green ventures and Romney's Bain money making pocket lining will be deliberately blurred, distorted, and lied about to try and defuse the Bain bomb. Romney will try and make the case that free enterprise and entrepreneurship is the cornerstone of American prosperity and venture outfits like Bain make that prosperity possible. He's got a lot of public belief in that going for him to make that case, true or not.


Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on American Urban Radio Network. He is the author of How Obama Governed: The Year of Crisis and Challenge. He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is host of the weekly Hutchinson Report Newsmaker Hour heard weekly on the nationally network broadcast Hutchinson Newsmaker Network.

Follow Earl Ofari Hutchinson on Twitter:




Rate It | View Ratings

Earl Ofari Hutchinson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a nationally acclaimed author and political analyst. He has authored ten books; his articles are published in newspapers and magazines nationally in the United States. Three of his books have been published in other (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The House is duty-bound to Bring Articles of Impeachment against Clarence Thomas

Critical Race Theory Yet another Strawman Issue

Think of the Two Decade Embarrassment of Thomas We Would Have Been Spared If We had known about Thomas's Porn Alleged Ob

Tea Party Now a Huge GOP Liability

The Awful Transformation of Bernie Sanders

Clarence Thomas Can Breathe a Sigh of Relief with Weiner Downfall

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend