Where is our moral compass?
- Advertisement -
Arshad M Khan
Source: Eurasia Review
a human rights charity, issued a report on drone strikes over the last
dozen years targeting 41 individuals, often multiple times, in Yemen and
Pakistan. The strikes killed 1141 people mostly women and children and
the targets generally survived including Ayman al-Zawahiri. The latter
was targeted twice killing 76 children and 29 adults but not him. Some
ask how that is different from a suicide bomber who kills himself and
often other bystanders in pursuit of a target. Of course the obvious
difference is that the drone operator goes home to dinner at the end of
his shift. After all this killing, the Taliban, who were not involved
in the 9/11 attacks in the first place (it was Saudi citizens), are far
from destroyed or disrupted or even degraded. They seem to be attacking
who has given any thought to our
tragic military adventures in Iraq must be sorry to see Secretary of
Defense Chuck Hagel leave. Not only did he express reservations about
the Bush/Cheney Iraq war, but, according to news reports, he wanted an
up-front discussion of the pros and cons of confronting IS (or ISIS or
ISIL the name changes almost too frequently) directly with US troops. Sergeant
Hagel had seen the Vietnam mess first hand; not so the ardent armchair
interventionists (AAIs) of this administration . Apparently the AAIs won out.
Moreover, previous cabinet officers have written about the excessive importance attached to polls by this White House. That
policy is poll-driven as opposed to principle-driven marks a certain
inability or disinterest in developing strategies with distinct
long-term goals and benefits, and then convincing the public of their
virtue. Thus the ad hoc
nature of policy, intuited by the electorate as an unsure hand at the helm.
a myriad reasons why we should not intervene now in Iraq, is a simple and important
one: we will now be busy making a new set of extremist enemies so dangerous
as to not mind killing themselves in pursuit of their aims. Bombing
them (our preferred method) kills many more civilians than the few
entrenched IS fighters in the heavily populated cities.
The bombing campaign
against IS has naturally
caused another flood of refugees, most of whom according to reports
found life more bearable under IS (as they are Sunnis, even if
extremist) than under the
viciously sectarian, Shia regime of former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki. For the refugees, life is getting even worse as the UN
program providing food aid has run out of funds; pressed by weak
economies, donors are not fulfilling commitments.
By the way, how does IS "involve an actual or imminent
threat to the nation"? It was candidate Obama's prerequisite, as a presidential hopeful
in 2007, for a president to "unilaterally authorize a military attack"
... "under the constitution."
Finally, what will be the cost of this new found war? One would guess at least the $1 million
per soldier per year of the Afghan war and then some, because bombing
campaigns are expensive. This, while poor schools do not often have
enough money for books, poverty and income inequality keep rising, and
our infrastructure, the backbone of any economy, is crumbling. Working
on the last would produce a multitude of decent paying jobs.
is often said that a prosecutor worth the name can get a grand jury to
indict a cabbage ... and its opposite -- that is not indict someone when
the prosecutor does not want to. The charade in Ferguson is over and
the white police officer who shot Michael Brown, the unarmed black
teenager, was not indicted. Such is the case in almost all such
And there are plenty: there were 54 police shootings in October 2014 of which many might have been
justified under the circumstances. But why has the police turned
'judge, jury and executioner' when non-lethal measures like tasers are
available. And there are also some very disturbing incidents. The
Saturday before Thanksgiving,
twelve-year old Tamir Rice was playing in Cudell Park and recreation
center in Cleveland's northwest side when he was shot by police -- apparently within two seconds of their arrival on the scene in response to a 911 call. They thought it was a real weapon! Is there something serious ly amiss with police training when such events are becoming commonplace across the country?
On November 19, in the UN General Assembly's Third Committee -- it carries responsibility for humanitarian issues -- there was a vote on a
resolution to condemn attempts to glorify Nazism and deny Nazi war
crimes. While it was clearly aimed at Ukraine and its neo-Nazis, it
also called for the adoption of the International Convention against
racial discrimination to have a mechanism for resolving complaints.
have we against such a resolution? One might even be forgiven for thinking
the U.S. proposed it. Telling, for our positions in this new world, that
it was Russia, our WW II ally against Nazism, who brought it to a vote.
We voted against -- we plus two other countries (Canada and Ukraine) --
while I55 countries voted for, and the resolution passed with a
Both at home and abroad, the actions of militarist authority beg the question, where is our moral compass?
|The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.