Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
Refresh  
OpEdNews Op Eds

When Barbara Lee Doesn't Speak for Me

By       Message Norman Solomon     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 7/26/17

Author 38935
Become a Fan
  (17 fans)

From Counterpunch

From youtube.com: Barbara Lee {MID-145613}
Barbara Lee
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Democracy Now!)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

For Americans who oppose perpetual war, no member of Congress has been more admired than Barbara Lee. Ever since she cast the only vote against a blank-check war resolution, three days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the Oakland Democrat has earned a reputation for bravely speaking antiwar truth to militarist power.

But, now, the core wisdom of her eloquent speech on the House floor nearly 16 years ago is under threat -- from Lee herself.

When Lee beseeched her colleagues to "think through the implications of our actions today, so that this does not spiral out of control," she was looking far beyond the politics and passions of that moment on Sept. 14, 2001. In a July 7 tweet, she has stepped away from steadfast support for the necessity of diplomatic initiatives.

- Advertisement -

Finding alternatives to war must include diplomacy. In the case of the "war on terror" that Lee resisted from the start, what spiraled out of control was endless and boundless war. These days, the escalating tensions with Russia could spiral out of control all the way to nuclear holocaust.

That's a major reason the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the symbolic hands of its Doomsday Clock even closer to apocalyptic midnight early this year. The nuclear peril is terribly real, and it's growing.

For that overarching reason, former Sen. Sam Nunn joined with three seasoned ex-diplomats to co-sign an open letter in late June, urging Presidents Trump and Vladimir Putin to discuss four specific proposals for reducing the dangers of nuclear war. Nunn -- drawing on his experience as chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee -- knows that top-level talks between the Russian and U.S. governments are crucial to reduce the risk of the world blowing up.

- Advertisement -

But Lee addressed the Trump-Putin meeting at the G20 summit in a very different way. Right after it was over, she sent out a tweet that denounced the very idea of the two presidents sitting down and talking: "Outraged by President Trump's 2 hr meeting w/Putin, the man who orchestrated attacks on our democracy. Where do his loyalties lie?"

Yet real diplomacy often requires that leaders we don't like -- at the top of a foreign government and maybe our own -- sit down together, talk and negotiate. In the case of the world's two nuclear-weapons superpowers, that could turn out to mean the difference between coexistence or co-annihilation.

During her historic 2001 speech on the House floor, when she insisted that "some of us must urge the use of restraint," Lee was refusing to be swept up in the easy and dangerous conformity of the times. She saw that militarized confrontation would be a tragically unwise alternative to diplomacy.

Lee now seems to have cast aside such understanding, at least as far as relations with Russia are concerned. Her constituents, as well as other supporters in California and beyond, should encourage her to return to it.

Certainly, Lee deserves credit for ongoing efforts to repeal the 2001 war authorization. Yet this month she veered way off the peace track by proclaiming that she was "outraged" because Trump and Putin had a meeting.

In the aftermath of 9/11, Rep. Lee offered profound insight and leadership instead of confusion and fear. That's why the saying "Barbara Lee speaks for me" took hold and lasted. But now we must let her know when she no longer speaks for us.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Norman Solomon is the author of "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." He is a co-founder of RootsAction.org and the executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. This article was first published by (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama's Nobel Peace Prize

Clinton's Transition Team: A Corporate Presidency Foretold

Obama's Escalating War on Freedom of the Press

Obama's Speech, Translated into Candor

The Long Road to Impeaching Trump Just Got Shorter

Is MoveOn Less Progressive Than the New York Times Editorial Board?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments


Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784

(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 31 fans, 1 articles, 3 quicklinks, 3712 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Russia derangement syndrome seems to have a stronger pull on supposed anti-war leftists than fear of nuclear annihilation. Bizarre.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:08:58 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (6+)
Help
 
Indent

Janet Supriano

Become a Fan
Author 90270

(Member since Oct 7, 2013), 6 fans, 325 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Lois Gagnon:   New Content

Or perhaps it is the reluctance to be martyred by friendly fire.

This woman Barbara Lee wants to work from the inside. Therefore, she has very real limitations. Trade-offs. She may be picking her battles. It's good to recognize where the losing propositions are located; and still move toward good.

We, on the side of sanity, are hog-tied against major systemic change. There is a monopoly on violence and it's not ours, and it's stunningly frightening.

Finer minds than my own are gathering steam for bigger change. Then again, Mother Nature is likely to have the final word on everything.
In the meantime, it is left to us to save the starfish one at a time.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jul 26, 2017 at 2:47:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Harold Novikoff

Become a Fan
Author 92139

(Member since Feb 8, 2014), 1 fan, 28 articles, 31 comments, 2 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

How can any sensible person not be outraged at everything our new administration is doing? Name one thing they have done to gain our trust? They are setting social progress back a century. Let Trump and Putin negotiate in public - with Barbara Lee as moderator. Please apologize to Barbara Lee.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:03:57 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

BFalcon

Become a Fan
Author 28059

(Member since Dec 20, 2008), 17 fans, 3 articles, 13650 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

It is one thing to discuss peace and cooperation, another to fail to see the truth as Trump did.

Submitted on Tuesday, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:39:05 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment