WaPo columnist David Broder reports that the following remark of McConnell's leaves him skeptical:
McConnell ascribed much of the distress both Packer and I had recorded
to the natural impatience of new members. The Senate, he said, "takes a
bit of getting used to." But if they stick it out, these newcomers will
learn to love the old rules, he said, and abandon their foolish impulse
to change them.
No, it's wildly unprecedented to force the Senate to get just about
every bill through on the basis of a supermajority of 60 to 40 in order
to get around the filibuster. Broder holds out hope:
Much as I differed with McConnell's defense of the status-quo Senate, I
have to agree with several of the other points he made at the breakfast.
He is right when he says that the Senate tends to be at its best when
the party ratios are relatively close -- say 55 to 45 -- rather than as
lopsided as they have been during Obama's first two years.
Sorry, but this strikes me as utterly starry-eyed in its' sweet, childish naivete. What are McConnell's legislative plans?
"What I hope we are going to have after November is more balance, more
balance, which would give us the opportunity to do things together that
simply were missing when you have this kind of disparity," McConnell
said. "But, I'm not going to be very interested in doing things left of
center. It is going to have to be center right. I think the president is
a flexible man. I'm hoping he will become a born-again moderate."
In other words, yeah sure, we'll work with Democrats, as long as that means doing everything our way.
The Republican Party as a whole has a number of serious issues
with the Constitution. They want to "review" the 14th Amendment,
calling it the "Anchor Baby" Amendment, they want to throw out the
Affordable Care Act based on the theory that Congress cannot exercise
any control over the economy, individual Republican Senators want to
repeal Social Security and the Federal highway system and naturally,
many Tea Party Republicans want to repeal the 16th Amendment, which
authorizes the income tax. Sharron Angle, who's running to replace
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), is a Christian
Reconstructionist, a pretty far-out philosophy for someone who's neck and neck with Reid in the polls. Rand Paul, running for Senator in Kentucky, wants to relieve
those poor, poor abused business owners from having to comply with the
Americans with Disabilities Act because, y'know, it just costs so much
money to comply with it.
In contrast to what Republicans think Americans want, Americans don't really care about how big government is, they want a government that effectively solves problems
and that sees to the needs of its citizens. Conservatives generally
know what percentage of the GDP is being spent by the government.
Progressives tend not to know because they don't regard the number as
particularly relevant to anything. For a progressive, the concern is
"Does the government have enough money to get the job done?" Whether
it's using 20% of the GDP or 21% or 21.75% of the GDP is a completely
Sorry, but the one and only way for the next Congress to be a
productive one, i.e., to do what American citizens want it to do, is
for the Democrats to retain their majorities in both chambers and to
reform the Senates' filibuster rule (Which is not in the Constitution) so that the Senate can get stuff done.
PN3(Ret), USN, 1991-2001. Done a number of clerical-type jobs. Computer "power user," my desktop is a Windows machine, but my laptop is an Ubuntu Linux.
Articles usually cross-posted at
Personal details at (more...