Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

What is Britain's Labour Party For?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Adnan Al-Daini       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 55822
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
- Advertisement -

"It doesn't really matter if it's Labour or Conservative because the people behind the scenes are always the same..." said a 23 year-old man from Liverpool, who took part in the August 2011 UK riots. The quote is from the report, "Reading the Riots" commissioned by the Guardian and the London School of Economics.

This quote tells us something that has now become common knowledge -- namely that people have lost faith in the democratic process. Politicians and society, all of us, the 99 percent and the 1 percent must take heed. People do not like this government, but they do not have much faith in Labour either. This explains why the Labour party is not benefiting from the dire economic situation we find ourselves in. Labour is not trusted. Their so called "light touch regulation" was an abdication of their responsibility to control the explosion of a debt-fuelled economy and the voracious greed of the "moneymen" that brought the country into this sorry state.

Some commentators blame Labour's difficulties on choosing the wrong leader -- Ed Miliband. I think it is the lack of credible policies that lie at the heart of the problem for Labour. It has no vision. It has articulated no alternative policies that are up to the job of tackling the immense problems faced by capitalism today.

Do they have a policy on bringing a fairer distribution of wealth in a rich country like Britain? A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), referenced in the Guardian , concludes that "income inequality among working-age people has risen faster in Britain than in any other rich nation since the mid-1970s." What are their policies on reducing unemployment, particularly among the young, that has now topped 1 million? What are their policies on reforming the banks and financial institutions? What are their policies to bring a more equitable balance between capital and labour? What are their policies to address the democratic deficit by wresting control from the "moneymen?"

- Advertisement -

Is it any wonder that people have lost faith in changing the status quo through the democratic process? As for the LibDems, who appeared more radical than Labour when not in government, a whiff of ministerial posts was enough for them to jettison any radicalism they may have had!

Fresh radical thinking is needed if we are to avoid the alienation of large numbers of our young to the detriment of us all. It is imperative to show the electorate that change can come through the ballot box. It is imperative to show that politicians are willing and able to challenge the tyranny of the "moneymen."

By acceding to the demands of financiers, politicians are being forced to move away from democratic oversight towards appointing non-elected former financial technocrats and bankers to directly run the economies of Europe. Most people know that they and people like them were pulling the strings anyway behind the scenes. But that was not enough for the IMF, the ECB, the EU, Hedge Funds, Rating Agencies, etc. Such technocrats are now in charge in Greece and Italy.

- Advertisement -

The Archbishop of Canterbury , commenting on the "Reading the Riots" report, writes in the Guardian:

"The big question Reading the Riots leaves us with is whether, in our current fretful state, with unavoidable austerity ahead, we have the energy to invest what's needed in family and neighbourhood and school to rescue those who think they have nothing to lose. We have to persuade them, simply, that we as government and civil society alike will put some intelligence and skill into giving them the stake they do not have. Without this, we shall face more outbreaks of futile anarchy, in which we shall all, young and old, be the losers."

The Labour Party would do well to start from the words of the Archbishop and devise and articulate policies to rescue our country from a course that is likely to rupture the cohesion of our society.  


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Dr Adnan Al-Daini took early retirement in 2005 as a principal lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at a British University. His PhD in Mechanical Engineering is from Birmingham University, UK. He has published numerous applied scientific research (more...)

Adnan Al-Daini Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Libyan revolution

The Pursuit of Happiness. America, live up to the ideals of your Declaration of Independence

The Power of the Media

The Obscenity of War and Military Spending in a World of Need and Suffering

Global Warming: Doing Nothing or Very Little Is Not an Option

Education -- Heading to Mediocrity for the Many