Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

What if Roberts Holds Out?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   3 comments
Author 42414
Message Marc Ash
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

From Reader Supported News

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts swears in President Donald Trump
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts swears in President Donald Trump
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Donald Trump)
  Details   DMCA

"Everything I do during this [trial preparation], I'm coordinating with White House counsel ... There will be no difference between the president's position and our position as to how to handle this "... I'm going to take my cues from the president's lawyers."

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaking with Sean Hannity on Fox Broadcasting, December 12, 2019.

That's a stark and unequivocal statement of intent by Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. He's on record saying he has no intention of facilitating anything resembling a fair trial of the impeachment charges against Donald Trump. What role does that leave Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts cast in?

The Constitution provides that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is to preside over an impeachment trial in the Senate should it reach that stage. But it's not clear what "preside" actually means. Most constitutional experts agree that it is the Senate that sets the rules, whatever rules the Senate deems appropriate. That would seem to leave no power whatsoever in the hands of the presiding Supreme Court Chief Justice.

But the intent of the framers was certainly not to facilitate a sham impeachment trial, and Roberts undoubtedly understands that. If McConnell's statement in and of itself amounts to an act of misconduct and he is to be taken literally, then the coming trial will surely violate at least the intent of the framers at a bare minimum.

Knowing that in advance creates a dilemma for Roberts. He has been served notice that he will be asked to preside over what the Senate leader openly admits will be a sham trial, in effect making Roberts a co-abuser of the Constitution, with or without his consent. That's not good for the country, the reputation of the Senate, or the reputation of the Supreme Court.

Are Roberts, his reputation, and the reputation of the Court mere passengers on a hijacked impeachment trial express to Sham City? Is Roberts indeed powerless to safeguard the process in any way?

Perhaps, but perhaps not. What if, in light of McConnell's clear statement of intent in advance to misconduct the Senate impeachment trial, Roberts held out, in effect not agreeing to preside unless he were guaranteed the powers needed to ensure what every United States senator, including McConnell, swore in their oath, to "do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws: So help me God."

McConnell is apparently more than willing to trample on the Constitution and the Republic by putting the Senate under the direct control of the President. Will Roberts consent to allow the Supreme Court to become a co-participant and tool of the Executive Branch as well? Caution: This is consequential.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

 

Well Said 2   Valuable 2   Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Marc Ash Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Marc Ash is the founder and former Executive Director of Truthout, now the founder, editor and publisher of Reader Supported News: http://www.readersupportednews.org

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Betrayal of Cecily McMillan

Are the Oak Ridge Defendants Obama's p*ssy Riot?

What Leeann Tweeden Did Not Say

Tortured Folks

Plutocrats Win Control of Congress

TPP: The Case for Treason

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: