Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus 1 Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   6 comments
Life Arts

What Would Jesus Say About Distortions of His Teachings?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bernard Starr       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 56926
Become a Fan
  (10 fans)


Lament of Jesus
(Image by Hugh Colmer)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

In his New York Times op-ed column on September 4, 2016, Nicholas Kristof asks"What Religion Would Jesus Belong To?" A clever headline, to be sure, but Kristof has a broader agenda: to explore how all religions, almost from their outset, depart from the teachings of their founders"and continue to do so today.

Kristof tells us that the Prophet Muhammad revered women and elevated their status, in stark contrast to how women are treated in Islamic nations today. He reminds us that Jesus didn't concern himself about abortion or gays, as many contemporary Christians do, but rather that his focus was on compassion for the sick and the poor, and on love and respect for neighbors and enemies.

Yet Kristof says that today many Christian leaders have built their careers on ideologies that don't have the familiar ring of Jesus' teachings. He quotes the bold statement of former pastor Brian D. McLaren, author of The Great Spiritual Migration, that "Our religions often stand for the very opposite of what their founders stood for."

In regard to Judaism, Kristof quotes Rabbi Rick Jacobs, who decries the "obsession" with ritual over "the courage and commitment to shaping a more just and compassionate world."

- Advertisement -

While Kristof cites Bible illiteracy, the widespread ignorance of the tenets of the Bible, he doesn't address illiteracy itself--the inability to read or limited reading skills. Throughout history, particularly in Islam and Christianity, illiteracy prevented the populaces from reading the words of the Masters. They knew only what they were told by their religious leaders. And what they were told often differed from the genuine teachings. Surprisingly, illiteracy persists today within religions.

According to one estimate, 800 million Muslims out of the total of 1.4 billion are illiterate--"6 out of ten cannot read." A report by the International Islamic News Agency (IINA) estimates that "Nearly 40% of the Muslim world's population are unable read or write."

Throughout the Middle Ages and into the early Renaissance in Europe few people other than the clergy and elites could read. As much as eighty to ninety percent of peasants and other commoners were illiterate. Thus, they could not read the New Testament to discover the Jesus of the Gospels, who lived and died a dedicated Jew. This illiteracy enabled the Church to demonize Jews and incite anti-Semitism. As I have illustrated extensively, Medieval and Renaissance artworks reinforced anti-Semitism by picturing a totally Christian Jesus with no trace of a connection to his Jewish heritage and identity. For hundreds of years wherever Christians turned--in churches, homes, and other public places--they only saw images of a Christian Jesus devoid of Judaism.

- Advertisement -

To insure that the populace would know only the Jesus that the Church hierarchy wanted them to know, the Church maintained a policy for a thousand years that forbid

individual ownership of the Bible. Sanctioning
- Advertisement -
only Latin for the Bible
further distanced the general population from reading it. Primarily the clergy, scholars, and some among the upper class were able to read the vulgate Latin of the Bible. And anyone who dared translate the Bible into native languages might be burned at the stake. That was
- Advertisement -
the fate of William Tyndale
as late as the 16th century (1536 CE), when he translated the New Testament into English.

The lack of access to the words of the religions masters and founders enabled religious leaders to distort the teachings of these towering figures to reflect their own ideologies.

Today the Bible is widely available on the Internet and in hotel rooms. And copies are handed out by devotees on street corners. A huge number of Bibles are purchased. It's a 2.5 billion dollar industry . But how many people are actually reading the "word of God"?

Kenneth Berding, professor of New Testament at Biola's Talbot School of Theology sounds the alarm that "biblical literacy in America is at an all-time low."

A LifeWay research study reported that "over 40 percent of the people attending church are reading their Bibles occasionally--maybe once or twice a month, if at all. In fact, 18 percent of attendees say they never read the Bible." Fifty percent of those interviewed could not name the four Gospels. And forty-two percent did not know that Jesus delivered the Sermon on the Mount.

Contributing to bible illiteracy in her U.S.is the fact, that at least fourteen percent or thirty-two million adult Americans can't read. And the reading level of twenty-one percent is below fifth grade level. Even more shocking, nineteen percent of high school graduates are functionally illiterate. These statistics reported by the U.S. Department of Education and the National Institute of Literacy have held steady for a decade.

- Advertisement -

Judaism has perhaps sidestepped bible illiteracy, at least for practicing Jews, by a tradition in which successive portions (parshahs) of the Torah (also called "The Old Testament") are read and discussed at weekly religious services. The entire five books of Moses"from Genesis to Deuteronomy" are read aloud over a period of one year every year

- Advertisement -
at Sabbath services
.

Within Christianity, the context of illiteracy and Bible illiteracy enables pundits to fashion Jesus in their own image. While Jesus is called the Prince of Peace, the Embodiment of Love, and the Lamb of God, ideologues have re-interpreted the Gospels to transform Jesus into a champion of their ideologies. And even many of those who read the Bible are prone to cherry pick and perceive what they conceive, ignoring contradictions to their preferences.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Bernard Starr, PhD, is a psychologist and Professor Emeritus at CUNY (Brooklyn College). His latest book is "Jesus, Jews, And Anti-Semitism In Art:How Renaissance Art Erased Jesus' Jewish Identity & How Today's Artists Are Restoring (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Corporations Plan for Post-Middle-Class America

The Pandemic Disease of the 21st Century Is on the Rise

Reza Aslan: Why Aren't You a Jew?

Why Have Art Historians Been Silent About the Falsification of Biblical History in Artworks?

Response to Bill O'Reilly: Jesus Didn't Start a New Religion

The Apostle Paul Lived and Died as a Dedicated Jew