Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 29 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 1/8/20

What Trump didn't address in speech this morning after Iranian missile strikes in Iraq early yesterday

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 40828
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

President Trump address to nation on January 8, 2020

After watching El presidente Trump deliver his "fashionably late" speech this morning to the American people, this after Iran early yesterday sent missiles attacking two separate American base facilities in Iraq, he refrained from announcing new retaliatory strikes against the Iranian's except for issuing new sanctions against Iran. Other than that it was the usual demonization of the Iranian "regime". After the speech he took no questions from the news people gathered in the audience.

It's early but here's an analysis of what Trump didn't address but is highly significant:

The Iranian missile strikes were extremely accurate.

The intelligence the Iranian's had was also extremely accurate.

Thus the strikes were intended to hit American base facilities in Iraq yet intended to avoid casualties.

The accuracy of the strikes showed Iran could hit any American military targets anywhere in the Middle East including Israel.

Obviously Iran showed restraint and compassion in delivering the strikes. They saw no benefit in killing anyone.

For the immediate future there's likely no additional military action between the US or Iran.

The US bully is unlikely to see Iran as weak because it refrained from killing Americans in the strikes.

Maybe-and it's a big maybe-the US gained respect for Iran knowing Iran could have struck with more deadly intentions but chose not to. Iran chose not to kill American military personnel in the strikes. That's big.

Now whether this "cease fire" will hold is another matter. Other incidents will likely occur provoking one side or the other to accuse the other and we might be right back where we've been the past few days.

Lastly,though Trump withdrew the US from the nuclear agreement with Iran in 2018, the other signatories particularly Britain, France, Germany had to recognize the restraint Iran exhibited in the retaliatory missile strikes it sent into Iraq which caused no fatalities. Maybe now they'll have the gumption to fully honor the nuclear deal with Iran even in the face of US secondary sanctions.


Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: