Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 10/6/19

We Meddle Too: Trump, Empire, and "The National Interest"

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   8 comments
Author 72590
Message Paul Street
Become a Fan
  (15 fans)

From Counterpunch


(Image by Photograph Source: Will Buckner – CC BY 2.0)   Details   DMCA

Never underestimate the power of the United States' American Exeptionalist and imperial doctrine. Look at the recent Washington Post revelation regarding wannabe fascist strongman Donald Trump's meeting with Russian ambassador Sergey Lavrov in the White House in 2017. Trump told Lavrov and another high-ranking Russian official that he wasn't concerned about Russia meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election because the United States does the same thing in other countries.

The revelation came days after the world learned that Trump used the threat to withhold U.S. military assistance to bully Ukraine's president into helping the Trump 2020 campaign find dirt on Democratic Party presidential candidate Joe Biden. It was in fact sparked by UkraineGate since the Ukraine scandal brought attention to how the White House has been hiding transcripts of Trump's degenerate discussions with foreign leaders.

Notice which part of the Trump-Lavrov story became an instant media-politics bombshell and which part did not. The media and the Democrats naturally seized on Trump's stated indifference toward Russian interference in the United States' so-called democracy. The other (and accurate) thing that Trump told Lavrov that the U.S. habitually messes with elections and politics in other countries just as naturally did not garner attention. It is a complete non-story.

There's much more to say than "we meddle too," of course. Washington has conducted and abetted coups, undertaken regime change wars, tortured, trained torturers, carpet-bombed, defoliated, raped, massacred, collapsed societies, funded dictatorships, armed death squads, undermined governments, launched terrorist attacks, assassinated, invaded other nations and broadly violated international and human rights law across the world for seven0plus decades. Many millions have died because of this rogue Superpower behavior.

Still, it is a remarkable thing for the public to learn that a U.S. president almost off-handedly told some top Russian officials visiting the White House that "hey, the U.S. interferes around the world all the time."

Why was the second part of Trump's comment to Lavrov considered unworthy of attention? What's that all about? It isn't just that reporters know that Trump regularly says false and nonsensical things or that the media and politics culture is zeroed in on impeachment-worthy evidence of Trump's willingness to garner information from foreign governments for use against his political enemies at home.

Also relevant is the simple fact that admitting America's "interference" (to put it mildly!) abroad does not fit well with the doctrinal notion that the United States is a global beacon and agent of democracy. It's a very poor match for the nation's grandiose sense of itself as a positive force on the global stage. At the same time, reigning American Exceptionalist ideology produces reflexive, silence-inducing dismissal of critical references to America's intrusion into other nations' internal affairs: if and when we intrude, it can only be for unavoidable and noble reasons since, as Bill Clinton's former Secretary of State once said, "We are good. The United States tries to do its best everywhere." (That's the same Secretary of State who went on CBS in 1996 to tell the world that the murder of half a million Iraqi children by U.S.-led economic sanctions was a "price worth paying" for the advance of U.S. foreign policy goals in the Middle East.)

A related thread in the doctrinal American story-line that shapes the dominant media-politics culture's treatment of Ukraine-gate is the notion that U.S. foreign affairs, properly conducted, are about the advance and protection of the U.S. "national interest." What is most terrible about Trump's extortionist phone call with the Ukrainian president as far as leading U.S. politicos, pundits, and commentators are concerned is not that Trump was bullying another country. The United States has long pushed other countries and their heads of state around with sheer impunity! "What we say goes," U.S. president George H.W. Bush exclaimed in the wake of the United States' savage assault (including the aerial incineration of thousands of fully surrendered troops on the infamous "Highway of Death") on Iraq in early 1991. "Do what we say," the Mafia-like message goes, "or pay the price!"

This has always been richly bipartisan, practiced by Democrats no less than by Republicans. Obama's savage destruction of Libya is a case in point. So is his and Hillary Clinton's support for the right-wing coup -- the removed Honduras' democratically elected president Manuel Zelaya in the spring of 2009.

In January of 2018, Joe Biden bragged to the Council on Foreign Relations that as U.S. Vice President he held up a $1 billion loan to Ukraine until it agreed to fire a prosecutor that Europeans, the International Monetary Fund, and Washington deemed corrupt that is, contrary to neoliberal interests.

Trump isn't in trouble for bullying Ukraine. America intimidates and pressures weaker nations all the time. Trump is in hot water because he got caught by an intelligence whistleblower injecting his selfish political interests into the imperial coercion. Bribery and extortion, standard U.S. weapons of imperial policy, are not supposed to be used for shameless political self-promotion and the cultivation of foreign influence in U.S. elections. U.S. foreign policy is supposed to be the perceived interests of the whole American ruling class, understood as "the national interest," not the immediate political self-interest of one man who would like to be a king.

What is the grand "national interest" that reigning U.S. political, intellectual, and media cite like some holy incantation? The great and prolific American historian Charles Beard was run out of U.S. public-intellectual life for having the audacity to observe in the 1930s and 1940s (in numerous books including The Idea of the National Interest [1934], The Open Door at Home [1934], The Devil Theory of War[1936], Giddy Minds and Foreign Quarrels[1939], and American Foreign Policy in the Making [1946]) that U.S. foreign policy was being run by a ruling class elite that had falsely identified American "national interest" with global Empire. Empire, Beard argued, worked against the interests of most U.S. citizens by hitching economic growth to the profit-lust of those atop what would come to be known as the military-industrial-complex and by enmeshing the United States in what Beard called (anticipating Orwell) "perpetual wars for perpetual peace."

In the wake of Beard's warnings and observations, the Pax Americana bloomed, spreading U.S. power across vast stretches of the planet. The United States has been enmeshed ever since in an endless series of wars, interventions, and conflicts, few if any of which have ever had the slightest thing to do with the United States' "national security." Quite the opposite: the American Empire replete now with more than 800 bases spread across more than 100 "sovereign" nations has put ordinary Americans at risk at home and abroad while distributing wealth and power upward. The costs of this empire have been born by society at large. The benefits, including the massive transfer of taxpayer money away from meeting domestic social needs to the provision of giant public subsidies for high-tech corporations like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin and the granting of global military protection to multinational U.S. corporations and investors have reverted to the wealth Few and their political and military agents and allies.

The bloated military-Keynesian Pentagon System has bankrupted social programs, feeding savage domestic socioeconomic disparity while fueling the deadly militarization of society. It has hitched American "prosperity" to a permanent war economy that is helping drive the world over an ecological cliff while constantly developing new super-weapons capable of decimating the world many times over.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Paul Street Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Paul Street (www.paulstreet.org and paulstreet99@yahoo.com) is the author of Empire and Inequality: America and the World Since 9/11 (2004), Racial Oppression in the Global Metropolis (2007), Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Could This Be Our Best Hope of Removing Trump From Office?

The World Will Not Mourn the Decline of U.S. Hegemony

A Lesson on Slavery for White America

Trump's Durable Base: Eight Reasons

Someone Tell a Reporter: the Rich are Destroying the Earth

"An Idiot Surrounded by Clowns": Why Trump (Still) Sits in the White House

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

6 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments


Fred W

Become a Fan
Author 8452
(Member since Oct 30, 2007), 1 fan, 246 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I agree with much of the article, except for the "Trump"part. It doesn't appear to me that he "strong armed" anyone, and I think finding out the origins of the Russiagate hoax that took up so much national attention that could have been used otherwise and finding out just how corrupt Biden may be are very much in the national interest.

If Trump deserves impeachment. let it be for legitimate reasons.

Submitted on Sunday, Oct 6, 2019 at 8:53:50 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (6+)
Help
Indent

George W.Reichel

Become a Fan
Author 86924
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Apr 1, 2013), 5 fans, 1312 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Fred W:   New Content

Good post Fred.There are plenty of other reasons to impeach him but his actions in most of these were supported by the other half of The Party.

Submitted on Monday, Oct 7, 2019 at 12:08:37 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784
(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 41 fans, 1 articles, 15 quicklinks, 5338 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

As long as the Deep State wants Trump removed from office, I doubt there is anything he can do to stop that from happening. They have a habit of getting their way in such matters. The whole sh*t show needs to go.

Submitted on Sunday, Oct 6, 2019 at 11:27:34 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
Indent

Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790
(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 23 fans, 18 articles, 4123 quicklinks, 7582 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Lois Gagnon:   New Content

Aren't you ashamed to hae that. wet noodle talking to the world as your president. HE needs to go. He never should have been there, and he needs to go. End of story!

Submitted on Monday, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:11:59 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
IndentIndent

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784
(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 41 fans, 1 articles, 15 quicklinks, 5338 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Susan Lee Schwartz:   New Content

I'm ashamed of every war criminal president regardless of the optics. Too many people allow themselves to be maneuvered into placing all their angst with this totally corrupted system onto the current puppet in chief. I would hope that by now people could see through the veil of systemic lies that the national security state uses to hide behind the buffoon their blindness to their own corruption accidentally put in power. Matt Taibbi nails it here: click here

Getting rid of Trump will accomplish nothing if we don't confront this criminal enterprise reeking havoc across the planet that uses subterfuge to disguise its true nature. THAT should embarrass you!

Submitted on Monday, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:58:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
Indent

Michael Dewey

Become a Fan
Author 11470
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Feb 15, 2008), 18 fans, 21 articles, 6 quicklinks, 3588 comments, 17 diaries
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Lois Gagnon:   New Content

I don't think its the deep state that wants him out. Well, maybe, just maybe, he doesn't want the long wanted bomb, bomb Iran war. Fingers are crossed its not timed with 2020 election.

Submitted on Tuesday, Oct 8, 2019 at 12:11:48 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790
(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 23 fans, 18 articles, 4123 quicklinks, 7582 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It is exhausting to make sense of all this, but then, you did it. Your conclusion nails it. WOW!

Submitted on Monday, Oct 7, 2019 at 2:10:22 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

Maxwell

Become a Fan
Author 4952
(Member since Feb 15, 2007), 2 fans, 4167 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

First, that the US in all probability meddles with elections in other countries does not mean that, therefore, "Russiagate is a hoax". It makes Russiagate more likely.

Second, such covert actions by The Deep State are always done under cover of "plausible deniability", as Putin continues to deny to this day. It's one thing for a US president to say "we may have done it in the past but we both have to stop". It's quite another message to say "We do it too, no problem", effectively giving up your end of plausible deniability with no reciprocity. I don't advocate pushing "American interests" against Russia to the point of nuclear chicken, but that doesn't mean we should capitulate

Submitted on Monday, Oct 7, 2019 at 7:12:35 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment