Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Washington's Infatuation with the MEK

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 5429
Message Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
- Advertisement -

Inarguably, Washington has a long history of supporting terrorists. As General William Odom, President Reagan's former National Security Agency (NSA) Director wrote in his 2007 article "American Hegemony, How to Use It, How to Lose It":

"[T]errorism is not an enemy. It is a tactic. Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics"".

Despite this long-standing use of tactic, there is no record of terrorists operating but a stone's throw away from the White House. Nor has there been such brazen embrace of a terrorist group dubbed an undemocratic cult- until now.

The 1997 Patterns of Global Terrorism report issued by the State Department stated the following about the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK or MKO, NCRI and various other acronyms):

- Advertisement -

"During the 1970s, the MEK staged terrorist attacks inside Iran to destabilize and embarrass the Shah's regime; the group killed several US military personnel and civilians working on defense projects in Tehran. The group also supported the takeover in 1979 of the US Embassy in Tehran. In April 1992 the MEK carried out attacks on Iranian embassies in 13 different countries, demonstrating the group's ability to mount large-scale operations overseas."

Listed as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) in 1997, the offices of the group's spokesperson , Alireza Jafarzadeh, was located at 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue. Even after the attacks of September 11 and America's declared "war on terror", the spokesperson and representative of the terror group was just down the street from the White House. Later, the organization would move its offices to 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, remaining close to the residence of the President of the United States of America located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

It is said that 'familiarity breeds contempt'. This is certainly not true of Washington officials and their cozy ties with the MEK cult. It seems that they are inching ever closer and have the audacity to flaunt their ties. Washington's actions are a long cry from Israel's who in the 1990s was secretly aiding the group. (The Israeli-MEK relations continues to be omitted from news headlines while the accusatory finger is pointed to Saudi Arabia for their financial support of the cult.)

- Advertisement -

Connie Brock of The New Yorker writes: "Israel had a relationship with the M.E.K at least since the late nineties, and had supplied a satellite signal for N.C.R.I. broadcasts from Paris into Iran. An Israeli diplomat said: 'The M.E.K is useful,' but did not elaborate.". According to the same report, the Israelis provided the MEK with unsubstantiated 'intelligence' on Iran's nuclear program. Not surprising since the aforementioned 1997 Patterns of Global Terrorism report states, "The MEK directs a worldwide campaign against the Iranian Government that stresses propaganda and occasionally uses terrorist violence."

The close relationship with Israel may help explain why it was that in spite of being listed as terrorists, the group managed to bribe prominent politicians; even as a provision of the defense authorization bill would grant the military the authority to detain and hold anyone indefinitely, or to assassinate any individual suspected of having ties to terrorists/al Qaeda. Yet, these terrorists were giving speaking fees to American politicians. (The group also has its tentacles around British politicians see HERE.)

What is even more mind-boggling is the fact that Israel was supporting a terrorist cult that had massacred the Kurds in Iraq in 1991, and only a few year later, the Israelis were training the Kurds in Iraq who had survived the massacre (obviously something that has been lost on the Kurds) while their killers, the MEK, were being chauffeured around by American soldiers a short distance away in Iraq - in America's 'war on terror'!

Meanwhile, back home, politicians were being bribed by the terrorists! Clearly, FATF (Financial Action Task Force) did not prevent money from being funneled to and from terrorists. Shamelessly, Washington is demanding that Iran become a member of FATF to stop terrorism financing!

Even while the terrorist group was doling out money to corrupt politicians so they could be removed from the FTO list, and Washington politicians accepted money from terrorists, the group continued with its terrorism and carried out cross-border raids inside Iran with the full knowledge and encouragement of the Bush administration (History Commons).

Concurrently, Washington was using other group members to promote propaganda against Iran with emphasis on 'human rights'. The leader of the terrorist cult, Maryam Rajavi's live satellite broadcast into Washington was cheered. This certainly gave new meaning to 'human rights' promotion by America as well as its 'war on terror'.

- Advertisement -

The hypocrisy reached across the aisle. Democrats and Republicans don't agree on much, but both parties supported this terrorist cult all the way to the top. When Hillary Clinton was running for President in 2008, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D -Texas), co-chair of Hillary's presidential campaign, not only shared her friendship with America's then presidential hopeful, but she also promoted America's pet terrorists the MEK. Congresswoman Jackson Lee went as far as calling Maryam Rajavi "Sister Maryam,[i]. (Would this make Hillary and Maryam 'sisters' too?)

Certainly, Hillary's push to remove the MEK from the FTO was a very sisterly act.

It is important to bear in mind that the group was removed from the list of FTO after U.S. officials disclosed to NBC that the MEK terrorist group was financed, trained and armed by Israel's secret service and responsible for the killing of Iran's nuclear scientists; and at a time when the United States was negotiating the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran Deal.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Soraya has lived and studied in-Iran, UK, France, and has obtained her Master's degree in Public Diplomacy from USC Annenberg and USC School for International Studies, Los Angeles.- She is an independent researcher, public speaker, radio (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Rude Awakening

Nukes and Temples

Samantha Power And The Age Of Genocide; Rwanda 1994 vs Gaza 2014

Abduction or Defection: The Case of Iran's Nuclear Scient

The Mushroom Effect

Blowback in Ferguson


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Become a Fan
Author 12330

(Member since Feb 27, 2008), 26 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit

  New Content

Since the Iranian revelation in 1979, I have never come across any Iranian, pro or anti regime, who would make any positive or even sympathetic statement about the MEK groups (except MEK members). Even their followers are so shamed and humiliated that they hide their support of this cult and label themselves as anti-regime. The sad part of such long history of betrayal. The administration's appeal to this group as possible means of success in their strategy against Iran is simply a sign of desperation. Perhaps the most descriptive name for this cult at the conceptual level would be "political prostitute".

Submitted on Monday, Jul 1, 2019 at 3:49:04 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment