Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 15 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 9/25/19

Was Clinton's Bombing of Yugoslavia "Worth It"?

Author 513646
Message Stephen Karganovic
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

Srebrenica Historical Project: Our website is a research tool -- use it!

For the last eleven years, our website has been the most respectable and comprehensive scholarly resource available on the internet about events in Srebrenica in July of 1995. On our website, we feature facts and issues, not personalities. We do not engage in idle polemics. Our mission is to collect evidence and to publish data-based arguments on this exceptionally important subject.

Our site was conceived to be a research tool. Its primary intended users are historians, political scientists, legal professionals, and journalists. We also welcome all interested members of the general public who wish to expand their knowledge about this major event of contemporary history, which took place at the close of the twentieth century. Srebrenica marked a watershed in relations between Serbs and Muslims, the two principal ethnic communities involved in the civil war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1992 1995. It has also shaped the way the Serbian people have been viewed over the last several decades.

As a consequence of the widespread perception of Srebrenica, or in contemporary usage the "Srebrenica narrative," quite apart from provable facts, relations between the Orthodox and Muslim communities in Bosnia currently appear to be irreparably damaged. That fact alone should be concerning for it adverse impact on peace and security in the Balkans. Furthermore, in its "narrative" version, Srebrenica has completely altered the way much of the world perceives the Serbian people. Largely because of Srebrenica, a nation that as recently as World War II was indubitably a victim of genocide, has now in the perception of many become identified as a perpetrator of that heinous crime. Finally, Srebrenica has also provoked numerous novelties in international law and jurisprudence, which are for the most part injurious to world peace and security. Standing out among them are ad hoc courts with their peculiar practices, including delivering draconian judgments against ethnically targeted individuals and pronouncing utterly baseless, but formally obligatory, historical assessments all in complete contravention of until recently undisputed legal norms and procedural principles. Additionally, the Srebrenica narrative (again, without necessarily any link to the facts) now constitutes the foundation of the lethal political doctrine of the "Right to protect" (R2P), which over two decades of its illegal application destroyed several million human lives and devastated numerous countries. All the above are to be counted as consequences of Srebrenica.

Srebrenica has, therefore, served as the pretext for significant precedents and wide-ranging effects in international relations and world affairs. For that reason alone, Srebrenica should be regarded as an issue of extraordinary importance.

Our NGO was founded in 2008 in the Netherlands and with the assistance of associates around the world (and here) since then has been working indefatigably to collect data about Srebrenica and critically assess "conventional wisdom" about it. Watch our British colleagues' superb video about the Hague Tribunal here. Our internet presentation is multilingual:






Topics on which we focus encompass the most important aspects of the Srebrenica controversy:

The Hague Tribunal and the genocide allegation

The forensics of Srebrenica (and here)

Unresolved issues about Srebrenica events in July of 1995

Serbian victims in Srebrenica

Statements of Serbian survivors

International conferences about Srebrenica and their conclusions

Video footage about Srebrenica

Books about Srebrenica

"and much more.

We invite you to visit our Srebrenica website, to recommend it to your friends and associates, and to use the information in this carefully assembled Srebrenica data bank to the best advantage and at every convenient opportunity.


Srebrenica masacre memorial
Srebrenica masacre memorial
(Image by aiva.)
  Details   DMCA

[Photo added by OEN Editor]


Supported 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Stephen Karganovic Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Stephen Karganovic is the president of the Srebrenica Historical Project.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Clinton's Bombing of Yugoslavia "Worth It"?

NATO 1999 Bombing of Yugoslavia a "War Crime" Ignored

Clinton Era Bosnia War, Precedent to the "War on Terror"

Srebrenica 'Genocide', But Where are the Bodies?

The Bosnia War: The Unseen "Evidence"

Will Canada Punish Denying Something Even if it is Not True?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments

David William Pear

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 50 fans, 80 articles, 383 quicklinks, 3819 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

NATO eastward march, Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo is not one of the largest US bases in Eastern Europe. It is used for black ops throughout the region.

Submitted on Wednesday, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:25:40 PM

  Recommend  (3+)

Aleksandar Sarovic

Become a Fan
Author 513600
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since May 24, 2019), 14 articles, 332 comments
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Formally, US President Bill Clinton was supposed to launch the attack on Yugoslavia. Naturally, he resisted committing the crime. Then appeared the Monika Lewinsky case where media showed great interest in the sexual life of President Clinton informing about it every day for more than a year. Then the American Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court found the interest in the sexual life of the president of the US and subpoenaed him to testify about his sex life before the Grand Jury. Since when are the US Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court interested in the sexual life of the American president?

The answer is - from the moment Bill Clinton resisted to commit the crime of the aggression on Yugoslavia. President Clinton lied before the Grand Jury about his sex life, which is what most people would do in his place. And because he lied under oath about his sexual life, it led to charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and his impeachment. Bill Clinton's sexual life might have removed him from the presidential position. Seriously?

The impeachment process of Bill Clinton was nothing else but blackmail. The blackmail forced President Clinton to lead the criminal NATO aggression on Yugoslavia or else to face the removal from his position. Of course, President Clinton preferred his job more than the lives of thousands of people and commanded the attack on Yugoslavia. The Lewinsky case was completely forgotten the moment that Bill Clinton decided to carry out military aggression against Yugoslavia. It was a crime. I wrote more about it in the article My debt to Yugoslavia.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:30:35 AM

  Recommend  (1+)