Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 12/5/20

War in Nagorno-Karabakh isn't over: Russian forces in permanent combat readiness

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 517911
Message Augusts Augustiņš

Some time ago President of Azerbaijan Aliyev announced that the war with Armenia is over, adding that the aim of the war was to restore Azerbaijan's territorial unity. Did this happen? Was the aim achieved even after signing the peace deal and the arrival of Russian "peacekeepers"? Of course, the answer is no. Aliyev is saying one thing, but thinking something entirely different.

Combat lasted for one and a half months, and for many it began and ended quite unexpectedly. Azerbaijanis were able to surprise the Armenians with their perseverance and efficiency on the battlefield and corner them literally and figuratively.

I must say that I don't see anything unexpected in the way the Azerbaijanis dealt with the "occupants" of Nagorno-Karabakh. Both sides have long been known to occasionally blast one another with artillery shells, shoot down each other's aircraft and hold sniper training with live targets.

Some clashes lasted for several weeks with no logical conclusion - they started suddenly and ended suddenly. What I'm trying to say is that the war between Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh (Armenia) didn't start on 27 September and end on 11 November - it began a long time ago. And nothing has yet ended because Putin was able to block the doors of Azerbaijan's victory, thus preventing the collapse of the already completely dysfunctional CSTO.

Now, forces are being regrouped, mistakes analyzed and "diplomatic" talks held because since the nineties Azerbaijan has been able to develop a powerful army equipped with the latest trends in weaponry. Moreover, it receives assistance from its Turkish friends who provide all sorts of help - from organizing joint drills to simply delivering ammunition. Therefore, no one should be surprised about what unfolded in Nagorno-Karabakh and there is no need for dumb questions like - why did the war start?

Now, experts, researchers and "intelligent" commentators are providing their view on the conflict, but rarely who remembers the fact that on 9 November a Russian Mi-24 helicopter was shot down over Armenia not far from Nagorno-Karabakh. Pashinyan conceded a few days later.

Two perfect reasons for Putin to unleash the full might of the CSTO against Azerbaijan - but he didn't. Putin did what benefited him the most. After the peace deal was signed, at least 20 Il-76 airplanes arrived in Erevan in the following 24 hours carrying Russian troops who were in full combat readiness the entire time. Currently, they are in Armenia as "peacekeepers".

I would urge the experts to remember the Kodori Valley in Georgia, where Russian "peacekeepers" were present for some time until they were eliminated, allegedly by "Georgian" forces. Then came the events of 8 August 2008, and now we have two pro-Kremlin enclaves in Georgia - the self-proclaimed "people's republics" of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Aliyev, using common sense, has for now decided to tolerate Putin's boots in Nagorno-Karabakh because only a mad man would risk engaging in an overly open conflict with Russia. Even though Russia's weapons are a bit scrappy and the laughingstock of different experts, they are still able to demolish entire cities. We don't have to look far for examples - there's Eastern Ukraine and, of course, Syria.

Time will tell what's what, but for now it seems that Aliyev has been able to maintain common sense and stop the war. He understands that there is no point in jumping into the abyss because "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush", i.e. its better to allow Russian "peacekeepers" to wander Nagorno-Karabakh, instead of having "polite little green men" in all of Azerbaijan.

At the same time, the goal of restoring the territorial unity of Azerbaijan has not been reached. Azerbaijan has decided to pause for a bit, while Russian forces in Armenia are in permanent combat readiness. The escalation of the conflict is merely a matter of time.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Augusts Augustiņš Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reserve Sergeant with the Latvian National Guard
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

China is developing biological weapons: consequences - COVID-19 pandemic

Sputnik V could turn out to be more dangerous than Covid-19

Kremlin is preparing a Trojan potato for the Baltics: project People's Republic of Vitebsk

Putin is and always will be an old chekist occupier with a grenade in his hand

Baltic Sea in danger: Nord Stream 2 begins plowing minefields

Kremlin's soft power is raising new generation of terrorists in US

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: