Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

War & Vermont #1

Message William Boardman
Become a Fan
  (34 fans)



      BY William Boardman  Email address removed"> Email address removed  


   SOUTH BURLINGTON -- If the Pentagon decides to base its new F-35 nuclear-capable attack fighter at the Burlington International Airport here, that decision is expected to put 1,366 nearby houses into a noise zone that the federal government defines as "incompatible with residential use," according to the Air Force's own draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) released in April. 


   The F-35 stealth fighter is ten years behind schedule, about 100 per cent over budget, and won't be deployed before 2019, but the prospect of having it in Vermont has sparked growing public and local government resistance to the plan.  Among the most serious concerns are noise, safety, lost housing, degraded air quality, limited job creation, depressed property values, and negative economic impact.   Already the South Burlington City Council has voted 4-1 to reject the expansion of the military base and other towns in the area have indicated doubts, without yet taking a formal position.  


   Support for the Pentagon plan comes from establishment politicians in monolithic, bi-partisan form from Vermont's highest public officials.  These include both U.S. Senators, Democrat Patrick Leahy and independent Bernie Sanders; Vermont's lone Congressman, Democrat Peter Welch; Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin (Democrat) and Lt. Gov. Phil Scott (Republican); Burlington Mayor Miro Weinberger, Democrat, as well as Republican gubernatorial candidate Randy Brock.   


   There is no prominent Vermont office holder standing in opposition. 


   Retired U.S. Air Force Colonel Rose Greco is a not-so-prominent office holder who opposes the Pentagon plan in her role as chair of the South Burlington City Council.  On May 14, she voted with the 4-1 majority of her council to reject basing F-35s in their town.  Col. Greco explained that:  "If you read the various categories in the Environmental Impact Statement that the Air Force produced you will see that in just about every category that there were significant negative effects on South Burlington".  There are far better basing [options] for the F-35 that in a small state in a small community in a small town.  We are sacrificing our town, we are sacrificing our community.  In my mind, the F-35s do not belong in this area."


   Another town close to the airport, Winooski, has already seen one public demonstration of about 100 people against the F-35 , but the city council has yet to take a position for or against the basing.  The city council's unofficial position is that it has a number of questions to which it needs answers before deciding.  The Air Force has apologized for failing to provide the city with its impact statement before the public hearing.   The Winooski school board, however, has voted against the warplanes. 


The South Burlington school district, while stopping short of taking a position on F-35 basing, issued a detailed critique of the plan as it affects the districts 5 schools, 500 teachers, and 2400 students.  The district letter discusses omissions in the Air Force environmental statement relating to noise impact on the schools, cumulative impacts on the district, and how the Air Force might mitigate the tax base losses caused by eliminated housing.   


   The city of Burlington is far enough away from the airport that it is unaffected by the jet noise that renders areas "incompatible with residential use."  Mayor Weinberger, a former airport commissioner, skipped the public hearing on environmental impact and came out in favor of the F-35 basing without offering any detailed analysis while calling jet noise "a limited impact." click here


   "Not a single person will lose housing because of this," Weinberger said, without explaining the environmental report's conclusion that more than 1300 houses would end up in a zone "incompatible with residential use."

               - 30 -


Rate It | View Ratings

William Boardman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend