Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

Wall Street demands action on debt ceiling, deficit

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Message Patrick Martin
Representatives of the Wall Street financial oligarchy are laying down the law to the Obama administration and Congress, demanding speedy action to raise the federal debt ceiling before an August 2 deadline, and massive cuts in spending on social programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, to slash the federal deficit.

Moody's Investor Service put the AAA bond rating of the US government on review for a possible downgrade Wednesday, the first time such a step has been taken by any of the bond rating agencies. A statement from Moody's -- which has spearheaded demands for austerity and budget cuts in Europe as well -- warned of a "rising possibility that the statutory debt limit will not be raised on a timely basis, leading to a default on US Treasury debt obligations."

The ratings agency said it was acting because of "the possibility that the debt limit will not be raised in time to prevent a missed payment of interest or principal on outstanding bonds and notes," adding that even a brief failure to make such payments would mean that the AAA bond rating "would likely no longer be appropriate." Moody's also placed on review the debt of several government-owned or government-backed corporations, including the mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The Obama administration welcomed the Moody's warning as a reinforcement of its demands for major cuts in spending. Treasury Department undersecretary Jeffrey Goldstein said in a statement, "Moody's assessment is a timely reminder of the need for Congress to move quickly to avoid defaulting on the country's obligations and agree upon a substantial deficit-reduction package."

The Moody's action followed by one day the issuance of an appeal from nearly 500 corporate CEOs for immediate action to raise the debt limit and longer-term action on deficit reduction. The appeal took the form of a joint letter from the US Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, the National Association of Manufacturers and the Financial Services Forum.

Chamber of Commerce president Thomas Donahue declared, "An unprecedented default on the nation's bills would have dire consequences for our economy, our markets, and Main Street Americans." NAM president John Engler, former Republican governor of Michigan, added that even a brief halt in debt payments would "strike an immediate and serious blow to any economic recovery."

The Washington Post noted that the CEO letter made no mention of opposition to tax increases, the position taken by the congressional Republicans, "because of differences of opinion among executives over whether to compromise on taxes to get a deal done." A debt default "would be exponentially more painful" than the minor increases in taxes proposed by the White House, one executive told the Post.

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke voiced similar concerns in testimony before a House committee hearing Wednesday. He warned that the August 2 deadline for raising the federal debt ceiling was real and imperative. Failure of the US government to make its debt payments would cause "shock waves through the entire global financial system," he said.

Bernanke compared the impact of a US debt default to the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the investment bank whose bankruptcy triggered the Wall Street and global financial collapse of September 2008. A US default "would create a huge financial calamity which would affect everybody and would set job creation back significantly," he continued.

Bernanke added that the measures that would be forced by a debt default would have colossal social impact, with an immediate 40 percent cut in all federal spending. "There would have to be significant cuts to Social Security, Medicare, military pay or some combination of those in order to avoid borrowing more money," he said.

He emphasized the necessity for major cuts in federal spending in the longer term, but sided with the Obama administration's position that cuts should be phased in over several years rather than applied immediately, because that would plunge the US economy back into recession. This produced a series of sharp exchanges with several Republican congressmen, who rejected the claim that August 2 represented a genuine deadline.

Three Republican congressmen held a press conference Wednesday morning to introduce legislation that would require the Obama administration to pay soldiers first, in the event that it must prioritize among its bills when the Treasury exhausts its resources after August 2.

These statements were the background for the speech by Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell Tuesday, in which he warned that precipitating a federal default -- the public goal of sections of the House Republicans linked to the ultra-right Tea Party groups -- would have disastrous political consequences.

McConnell cited the concerns in big business over the prospect of a federal default, saying, "If we're unable to come together, we think it's extremely important that the country reassure the markets that default is not an option."

The Republican leader described Obama's call for minuscule tax increases on hedge fund operators, oil companies and corporate jets as "poll-tested rhetoric of class warfare," adding, "The financial security of the nation was being gambled on the President's wager that he could convince people our problems would be solved if we just all agreed to take it out on the guy in the fancy house down the street."

Rather than enact such tax increases, or take the blame for a federal default that would crash the financial system, McConnell proposed to allow Obama to raise the debt ceiling on his own, while requiring him to enumerate spending cuts equivalent to the increase in the debt ceiling, even if these cuts were not enacted.

The scale of the budget cuts would have to be determined by the outcome of the 2012 elections, he claimed, adding, "As long as this president is in the Oval Office, a real solution is probably unattainable."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Patrick Martin Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Patrick Martin writes for the World Socialist Website (, a forum for socialist ideas & analysis & published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI).
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Low-wage, No-raise Economy

Mounting political crisis in Washington amidst talk of removal of Trump

US House of Representatives votes to abolish Medicare

Nearly One Million US Workers Cut Off Unemployment Benefits

Obama hails deal to impose record cuts in social spending

US House of Representatives approves plan to destroy Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend