Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News   

USDA and Corporate Agribusiness Continue to Push Animal ID Scheme

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Will Fantle

Washington, D.C.: The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) released a new proposed rule for mandatory animal traceability. While the USDA already has traceability requirements as part of existing animal disease control programs, the proposed rule goes much further to require animal tagging and tracing without specific disease threats. The rule has raised significant concerns among family farm and ranch advocates, who accuse the agency of failing to provide a coherent, factual explanation of the program's necessity.

"The USDA brags about the success of past programs, but has abandoned the principles that made them successful," argued Bill Bullard, CEO of R-CALF USA. "Past programs were based on sound science and were developed in response to the transmission, treatment and elimination of specific identified diseases. The USDA's new approach is a one-size-fits-all approach that does not specifically aim at the control of livestock diseases," he added.

The proposed rule greatly expands what animals must be identified, including feeder cattle, which are processed at a young age and never enter the breeding herd. "The large volume of animals that the USDA proposes to track could overwhelm the capabilities of state agencies, making it impossible to retrieve useful data if there is in fact a disease outbreak," stated Gilles Stockton, a Montana rancher and member of the Western Organization of Resource Councils.

The proposed rule creates new requirements for not only animal owners, but also for businesses associated with livestock. For example, veterinarians and auction barns would be required to keep records on every tagged animal for a minimum of five years.

"On the one hand, the agency points to diseases with long incubation periods, such as tuberculosis, to justify these extensive new recordkeeping requirements," notes Judith McGeary, Executive Director of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance and vice-chair of the USDA Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal Health. "But at the same time, the agency plans to require the same paperwork on feeder cattle, which are butchered between one and two years of age. So, the majority of the records that vets and auction barns will be storing will be on animals that died years before. All this does is impose unnecessary burdens on small businesses, accelerating the loss of independent businesses to corporate industrial-scale agribusiness," she added.

"Consumers need the USDA to start focusing on the animal health and food safety risks posed by industrialized meat production," said Patty Lovera, Assistant Director of Food & Water Watch. "If USDA devoted as much energy to preventing animal diseases as it has to promoting animal tracking, our food system would be in much better shape," Lovera added.

The USDA has presented its traceability scheme as an animal health program, but it has emphasized the importance of the export market to the United States in promoting its new plan. The powerful meatpacking lobby has continued to push for such mandated traceability requirements in order to develop international standards for exports. Critics have suggested this is not in the American public's best interest, however, since the U.S. is a net importer of beef and cattle, and the profits from the export market go to a small handful of massive meatpacking companies.

"If Americans don't want their food supply to cave like the banking and housing industries, they need to urge the USDA to rewrite the rule to address the needs of family farmers rather than the meatpacking lobby," stated Mark A. Kastel, senior farm policy analyst at The Cornucopia Institute.

USDA and Corporate Agribusiness Continue to Push Animal ID Scheme

Consumers and Independent Producers Lose if Big Ag Wins on Animal Tracking

The Cornucopia Institute ( is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Through research, advocacy and economic development our goal is to empower farmers both politically and through marketplace initiatives.

Rate It | View Ratings

Will Fantle Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I work for The Cornucopia Institute. We are a non-profit that works to protect sustainable/organic food and small-scale farming. We often write press releases surrounding what is happening in the industry and what our research discovers. You can (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Organic: Food Justice for the 99% (Response to Time Magazine/Dr. Oz denigration of organic consumers)

Not Good Enough for Pet Food: Chinese Organic Food Scrutinized at Congressional Hearing

Organic Industry Watchdog: FDA Food Safety Rules Threaten to Crush the Good Food Movement

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend