Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 9/27/13

URI Professor meets with Vladimir Putin, other world leaders

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     (# of views)   No comments, 3 series
Author 6199
Message Nicolai Petro
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
KINGSTON, R.I., Sept. 23, 2013 -- Vladimir Putin is "on top of his game.'' Russia helped avert a war by cutting a deal over Syrian's use of chemical weapons. And post-Soviet youth are striving for economic and political power.

Those topics and more came up during a week-long conference in Russia attended by University of Rhode Island Political Science Professor Nicolai N. Petro, as well as Putin and other world leaders.

Kremlin
Kremlin
(Image by Nicolai Petro)
  Details   DMCA

Kremlin by Nicolai Petro
What made the annual gathering unusual this year is that Putin answered questions live from politicians and journalists for nearly three hours after a speech in which he touted Russia's global status.

America's perceived diminishing role as a superpower, Russia's treatment of gays and lesbians, and Vladimir Putin's exception to the United States' "exceptionalism'' were also talked about during the meeting, from Sept. 16 through 20 in the Novgorod Region in northwestern Russia.

A scholar of Russian politics and culture, Petro is living in Odessa, Ukraine, for a year on a Fulbright grant researching the role of the Russian Orthodox Church. This is the second time the 55-year-old Kingston resident has been invited to the gathering, called the Valdai Discussion Club.

In a Q&A with URI, Petro talked about his impressions of the Russian president, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's use of chemical weapons to kill his own people, and whether Putin is too "macho.''

Tell us about the conference? Who was there and what was the purpose of it?

This year marked the 10th anniversary of the Valdai Discussion Club, created in 2004 by several prominent western Russian specialists and journalists to develop a dialogue with their counterparts in Russia and as an opportunity for both to discuss matters of common interest with Russian political leaders.

Only about 30 people attended the first meeting. More than 200 -- leading foreign leaders, academics, policy analysts, and journalists -- attended this year's meeting. Every year the president of Russia, senior government officials, political leaders of major political parties, and members of the opposition give talks at the gathering.

For the first time this year, President Putin's speech was televised live, along with a question-and-answer session with him that lasted about three hours. Each year a theme is chosen, and this year's meeting was devoted to "Russia's Diversity for the Modern World." I was also invited to the conference in 2007.

What were your impressions of Putin?

Putin is still very much on top of his game. It is exceptional for any world leader to spend so much time answering questions, particularly ones that are not scripted. In this case, his speech was followed by responses from former French Foreign Minister Francois Fillon, former German Defense Minister Volker Ruehe, former Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi, and Dimitri Simes, the president of the Center for the National Interests and publisher of the foreign-policy journal The National Interest.

There were many questions from the floor. I found it particularly noteworthy that Putin, in a live broadcast, took questions from three members of the political opposition -- Vladimir Ryzhkov, Xenia Sobchak, and Ilya Ponomarev -- all of whom are well-known critics of his policies.

Did he say anything about the op-ed piece in The New York Times that took exception to America's so-called "exceptionalism?"

He did. He was asked to explain how the article came about. He told the audience that it had been his idea to write something that might have an impact on the American public debate on Syria. After drafting the piece and editing it, his advisors told him to wait until after President Obama's speech to the nation, in case there was anything in the speech that should be addressed.

It was only after Obama's speech, in which he claimed that America's willingness to act is "what makes us exceptional ... let us never lose sight of that essential truth," that Putin added a final paragraph to his original remarks, in which he said that "it is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Nicolai Petro Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Nicolai N. Petro is professor of political science at the University of Rhode Island. He has served as special assistant for policy in the U.S. State Department and as civic affairs advisor to the mayor of the Russian city of Novgorod the Great. His books include: The Rebirth of Russian Democracy (Harvard,1995), Russian Foreign Policy (Longman, 1997), and (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Russia Can't Be Manipulated Through External Pressure

Ukraine: Why Culture Matters

How Accurate is Freedom House?

How the E.U. Can Bring Ukraine Into Europe

Some Orthodox Reflections on the (P)ussy (R)iot Case

Twice Lost in Translation